[Ssh] keeping it civil and wglc

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

We've had quite a bit of recent discussion on the ntruprime draft
and broader issues. Most of that has been quite reasonable (if a
bit voluminous:-) but a few messages did approach the point where
I got asked if I'd send a reminder to keep things civil. In this
case, I guess the thing to keep in mind is to not write text that
a reader might interpret as you questioning the motivations of
another WG participant (or another WG!). FWIW, my experience in the
IETF is that speculation as to the motives of others, or upping the
ante by throwing in legal terminology, is really never productive,
so even if you do indulge yourself in such speculations, please
keep the results to yourself and don't feel the need to share those
with the rest of us, thanks.

Also, if you've not replied to the WGLC thread for the ntruprime
draft [1], (or if your position's changed) please do so - while
we've had lots of related discussion, a good chunk of that is hard
to interpret when it comes to figuring out the WG's conclusions
related to the draft. There's another week and a bit to run on that
WGLC but no harm sending that mail now, eh:-)

Thanks,
S.

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ssh/PVBl6I1qyDTj3U2R7X0ePsDKomk/