IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Fun with URLs and regex

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 28 January 2015 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAA51A0056 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:06:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P8-I0q7MfMWN for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:06:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94BA1A1BF6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:06:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DACF1DE05D; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:06:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=wR4W5XA1mQyvsH Rx+M201j6br3Q=; b=sXKQMUxHT2BXJ5G/4m92FRoCGAh4UWu8mj8BTcCuFUa2Xq gxSDWVxY5pT/9+YlPGMpjcN71vooCeuREDDdh/Nd/YRrHTFkUyuoUO0moKU7M0sS 2RifOQNK7jFwWTTsCEn2reTiUUVUf62puGKsIkTs28FpM7pD5XMW5AKYlqqVU=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 44FD01DE005; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:06:48 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:06:47 -0600
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Message-ID: <20150128230643.GH3110@localhost>
References: <A1E5B0EC-FAD5-4178-8C7B-540BEB61DC06@mnot.net> <54AEB660.1020701@intertwingly.net> <F122ADA8-4A96-4F88-BB9F-3C5C6A544067@mnot.net> <54C84872.5040902@intertwingly.net> <EF1E36FA-6A30-4A65-9520-5A31571EE445@mnot.net> <54C95132.2060402@gmx.de> <154ABFBB-AB8C-447A-89A3-D1746EFBF1C6@gbiv.com> <54C95AF7.6030703@gmx.de> <837DAA83-546E-425A-AD13-003F743B54A9@gbiv.com> <0FC6548B-1BC7-43C1-B421-6174F70D14D8@mnot.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0FC6548B-1BC7-43C1-B421-6174F70D14D8@mnot.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/U7mHy9BWOjTrml3QJpsvW6Vrb4w>
Cc: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fun with URLs and regex
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:06:50 -0000

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 09:54:28AM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2015, at 9:06 am, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
> > I don't know how I got beaten into submission on that for RFC7230.

Not that RFC7230 updates STD 66 anyways, so this looks like:

> I followed the e-mail discussion, resulting issue to the ultimate commit:
>    <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/2279>
> 
> I wouldn't call it a beating -- you didn't seem to need much convincing at all :)
> 
> That aside, it looks like we need an errata here...

an erratum.

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email