Re: [apps-discuss] Fun with URLs and regex

[Sam Ruby <[e-mail]>]

On 01/27/2015 08:53 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> What I was hoping for was an update of the "valid URI" filter to take
> this into account at
> <https://url.spec.whatwg.org/interop/test-results/?filter=valid>.
>
> E.g., that list currently includes test case 63,
> "https:/example.com/", which is valid according to the generic syntax
> in RFC3986, but not when you consider the scheme-specific constraints
> for HTTPS in RFC7230.
>
> By filtering out these cases, we can see the places we potentially
> need to pay attention to in the RFCs.
>
> Is that possible?

Done and deployed.  Let me know if you see any problems.

For now, I decided to match your Python's script's behavior with respect
to fragments and known but non-HTTP schemes.  This doesn't affect any of
the existing items in the current urltestdata set.

- Sam Ruby