auth48archive Discussion Archive - Date Index - Feb 2026

[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]

---

Feb 14 2026
• [auth48] Re: Authors - Re: draft-eastlake-fnv-35 (RFC-to-be 9923), Donald Eastlake
• [auth48] Authors - Re: draft-eastlake-fnv-35 (RFC-to-be 9923), Alice Russo
• [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9925 <draft-ietf-lamps-x509-alg-none-10> for your review, Alanna Paloma
Feb 13 2026
• [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9925 <draft-ietf-lamps-x509-alg-none-10> for your review, Deb Cooley
• [auth48] Re: draft-eastlake-fnv-35 (RFC-to-be 9923), Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-04>, Kris Kwiatkowski
• [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9912 <draft-ietf-raw-architecture-30> for your review, Pascal Thubert
• [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9925 <draft-ietf-lamps-x509-alg-none-10> for your review, Alanna Paloma
• [auth48] Re: draft-eastlake-fnv-35 (RFC-to-be 9923), Alice Russo
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9853 <draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc-20> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9853 <draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc-20> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9912 <draft-ietf-raw-architecture-30> for your review, Kaelin Foody
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9768 <draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-34> for your review, Sandy Ginoza
• [auth48] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, mohamed.boucadair
• [auth48] Re: draft-eastlake-fnv-35 (RFC-to-be 9923), Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
• [auth48] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, Megan Ferguson
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9925 <draft-ietf-lamps-x509-alg-none-10> for your review, David Benjamin
Feb 12 2026
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9925 <draft-ietf-lamps-x509-alg-none-10> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, Mahesh Jethanandani
• [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9925 <draft-ietf-lamps-x509-alg-none-10> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, Megan Ferguson
• [auth48] Re: draft-eastlake-fnv-35 (RFC-to-be 9923), Alice Russo
• [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5272bis-10>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9921 <draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-08> for your review, Alice Russo
• [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5274bis-10>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, Mahesh Jethanandani
• [auth48] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, Megan Ferguson
• [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5273bis-10>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9921 <draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-08> for your review, Alice Russo
• [auth48] Re: [AD] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes-16>, Eliot Lear
Feb 11 2026
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9930 <draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-22> for your review, Madison Church
• [auth48] Re: [AD] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes-16>, Sandy Ginoza
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9849 <draft-ietf-tls-esni-25> for your review, Madison Church
• [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-04>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] [AD] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes-16>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9913 <draft-ietf-raw-technologies-17> for your review, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen
• [auth48] Re: [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Youngkwon Lim
• [auth48] Re: Final question: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9926 <draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration-18> for your review, Sandy Ginoza
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes-16>, Eliot Lear
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes-16>, Lars Eggert
• [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9912 <draft-ietf-raw-architecture-30> for your review, Pascal Thubert
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9935 <draft-ietf-lamps-kyber-certificates-11> for your review, Deb Cooley
• [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes-16>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9935 <draft-ietf-lamps-kyber-certificates-11> for your review, Sean Turner
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9935 <draft-ietf-lamps-kyber-certificates-11> for your review, Bas Westerbaan
• [auth48] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, mohamed.boucadair
• [auth48] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, Mahesh Jethanandani
• [auth48] Re: Final question: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9926 <draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration-18> for your review, Pascal Thubert
• [auth48] Final question: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9926 <draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration-18> for your review, Sandy Ginoza
• [auth48] Re: Cluster Queries for C405: draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20, draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-31, draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32, draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-26, and draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-29, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Feb 10 2026
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9935 <draft-ietf-lamps-kyber-certificates-11> for your review, Kampanakis, Panos
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-17>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-17>, Marco Tiloca
• [auth48] Re: Cluster Queries for C405: draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20, draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-31, draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32, draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-26, and draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-29, Megan Ferguson
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9888 <draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-08> for your review, Megan Ferguson
• [auth48] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, Megan Ferguson
• [auth48] Re: [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Youngkwon Lim
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9932 <draft-halen-fedae-03> for your review, Kaelin Foody
• [auth48] Re: [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Sandy Ginoza
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9913 <draft-ietf-raw-technologies-17> for your review, Cavalcanti, Dave
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9913 <draft-ietf-raw-technologies-17> for your review, Pascal Thubert
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9913 <draft-ietf-raw-technologies-17> for your review, Pascal Thubert
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9913 <draft-ietf-raw-technologies-17> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9912 <draft-ietf-raw-architecture-30> for your review, Ketan Talaulikar
• [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9913 <draft-ietf-raw-technologies-17> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9912 <draft-ietf-raw-architecture-30> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9912 <draft-ietf-raw-architecture-30> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9936 <draft-ietf-lamps-cms-kyber-13> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9936 <draft-ietf-lamps-cms-kyber-13> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9935 <draft-ietf-lamps-kyber-certificates-11> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9935 <draft-ietf-lamps-kyber-certificates-11> for your review, rfc-editor
Feb 09 2026
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9921 <draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-08> for your review, Thomas Fossati
• [auth48] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, mohamed.boucadair
Feb 08 2026
• [auth48] Re: [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Youngkwon Lim
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9932 <draft-halen-fedae-03> for your review, Stefan Halen
• [auth48] Re: draft-eastlake-fnv-35 (RFC-to-be 9923), Donald Eastlake
• [auth48] Re: (2) [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (RE: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Rajan Laxman Joshi
• [auth48] Re: draft-eastlake-fnv-35 (RFC-to-be 9923), Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
• [auth48] Re: (2) [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (RE: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
Feb 07 2026
• [auth48] Re: (2) [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (RE: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Min Woo Park
• [auth48] Re: [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Madhukar Budagavi
• [auth48] Re: [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Kwang Pyo Choi
Feb 06 2026
• [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9920 <draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-04> for your review, Rebecca VanRheenen
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9932 <draft-halen-fedae-03> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9932 <draft-halen-fedae-03> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9920 <draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-04> for your review, Alexis Rossi
• [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9920 <draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-04> for your review, Paul Hoffman
• [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9920 <draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-04> for your review, Rebecca VanRheenen
• [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9926 <draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration-18> for your review, Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• [auth48] Re: [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Youngkwon Lim
• [auth48] Re: [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
• [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9926 <draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration-18> for your review, Alice Russo
• [auth48] Re: [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Youngkwon Lim
• [auth48] Re: [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Sandy Ginoza
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-davids-forsalereg-21>Document intake questions about, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-davids-forsalereg-21>Document intake questions about, Marco Davids
• [auth48] Re: [ISE] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Youngkwon Lim
Feb 05 2026
• [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-davids-forsalereg-21>Document intake questions about, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9921 <draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-08> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9921 <draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-08> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] [ISE] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review (Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>), Sandy Ginoza
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9930 <draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-22> for your review, Alan DeKok
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions abou <draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-17>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm-28>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-17>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions abou <draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-17>, Roland.Schott
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm-28>, Marco Tiloca
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-17>, Marco Tiloca
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9849 <draft-ietf-tls-esni-25> for your review, Kazuho Oku
Feb 04 2026
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9930 <draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-22> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9930 <draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-22> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-30>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-30>, Kent Watsen
• [auth48] Re: Document intakequestionsabout<draft-ietf-cats-usecases-requirements-13>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: Document intakequestionsabout<draft-ietf-cats-usecases-requirements-13>, Yao Kehan
• [auth48] Re: draft-eastlake-fnv-35 (RFC-to-be 9923), Karen Moore
• [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9920 <draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-04> for your review, Paul Hoffman
• [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9920 <draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-04> for your review, Rebecca VanRheenen
Feb 03 2026
• [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm-28>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-17>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9849 <draft-ietf-tls-esni-25> for your review, Madison Church
• [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9920 <draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-04> for your review, Alexis Rossi
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9919 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12> for your review, Alanna Paloma
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9849 <draft-ietf-tls-esni-25> for your review, Eric Rescorla
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9849 <draft-ietf-tls-esni-25> for your review, Madison Church
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9919 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12> for your review, Sean Turner
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9919 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12> for your review, Alanna Paloma
• [auth48] Question about auth email. qe: auth48archive Digest, Vol 45, Issue 13, Corinne Rauch
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9919 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12> for your review, Tadahiko Ito
• [auth48] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, Megan Ferguson
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-30>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9919 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12> for your review, Sean Turner
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9919 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12> for your review, Tadahiko Ito
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-30>, Kent Watsen
• [auth48] Re: auth48archive Digest, Vol 45, Issue 9, Corinne Rauch
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questionsabout<draft-ietf-cats-usecases-requirements-13>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questionsabout<draft-ietf-cats-usecases-requirements-13>, Yao Kehan
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9924 <draft-lim-apv-09> for your review, rfc-editor
• [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9920 <draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-04> for your review, Rebecca VanRheenen
• [auth48] [IANA #1442949] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, Amanda Baber via RT
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9919 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12> for your review, Alanna Paloma
Feb 02 2026
• [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9920 <draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-04> for your review, Paul Hoffman
• [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9920 <draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-04> for your review, Rebecca VanRheenen
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-30>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9919 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12> for your review, Alanna Paloma
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9888 <draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-08> for your review, Megan Ferguson
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9919 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12> for your review, Sean Turner
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions abou <draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-17>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about<draft-ietf-cats-usecases-requirements-13>, Sarah Tarrant
• [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9919 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12> for your review, Corey Bonnell
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions abou <draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-17>, Roland.Schott
• [auth48] Re: [AD] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9907 <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28> for your review, mohamed.boucadair
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about<draft-ietf-cats-usecases-requirements-13>, Yao Kehan
Feb 01 2026
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>, Youngkwon Lim
• [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-lim-apv-09>, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)

---

[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]

---