cbor Discussion Archive - Date Index - Apr 2026

[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]

---

Apr 20 2026
• [Cbor] Re: EDN: /*/ in the corpus?, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: EDN: /*/ in the corpus?, Rohan Mahy
Apr 19 2026
• [Cbor] Re: EDN: /*/ in the corpus?, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: EDN: /*/ in the corpus?, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: EDN: /*/ in the corpus?, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: EDN: /*/ in the corpus?, Michael Richardson
• [Cbor] Re: comments in EDN quoted strings, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: EDN: /*/ in the corpus?, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: EDN: /*/ in the corpus?, Michael Richardson
• [Cbor] Re: comments in EDN quoted strings, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: comments in EDN quoted strings, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: EDN: /*/ in the corpus?, Anders Rundgren
• [Cbor] EDN: /*/ in the corpus?, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: comments in EDN quoted strings, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: comments in EDN quoted strings, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: comments in EDN quoted strings, Vadim Goncharov
Apr 18 2026
• [Cbor] comments in EDN quoted strings, Rohan Mahy
Apr 17 2026
• [Cbor] Re: Partial implementation - what CBOR libraries might not implement, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Partial implementation - what CBOR libraries might not implement, Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Anders Rundgren
Apr 15 2026
• [Cbor] Re: Huge non-consensus scope creep in EDN, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: Huge non-consensus scope creep in EDN, Wolf McNally
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Michael Richardson
• [Cbor] Re: Huge non-consensus scope creep in EDN, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: Huge non-consensus scope creep in EDN, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: Huge non-consensus scope creep in EDN, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: sort<<>> (Was: New issues and one more PR on EDN), Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: sort<<>> (Was: New issues and one more PR on EDN), Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: sort<<>> (Was: New issues and one more PR on EDN), Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] sort<<>> (Was: New issues and one more PR on EDN), Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: I-D Action: draft-bormann-cbor-edn-app-ext-01.txt, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: New issues and one more PR on EDN, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: New issues and one more PR on EDN, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: New issues and one more PR on EDN, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: Huge non-consensus scope creep in EDN, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: New issues and one more PR on EDN, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: New issues and one more PR on EDN, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: New issues and one more PR on EDN, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: New issues and one more PR on EDN, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: New issues and one more PR on EDN, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: New issues and one more PR on EDN, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] New issues and one more PR on EDN, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Integrated single-pass BNF, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: Huge non-consensus scope creep in EDN, Rohan Mahy
Apr 14 2026
• [Cbor] Re: Huge non-consensus scope creep in EDN, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: Huge non-consensus scope creep in EDN, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: Huge non-consensus scope creep in EDN, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: Huge non-consensus scope creep in EDN, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: comments in app-strings, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: cbor-edn-literals: Overview of string-ish with and without application-oriented literlas, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: comments in app-strings, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: cbor-edn-literals: Overview of string-ish with and without application-oriented literlas, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Huge non-consensus scope creep in EDN, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: cbor-edn-literals: Overview of string-ish with and without application-oriented literlas, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: cbor-edn-literals: Overview of string-ish with and without application-oriented literlas, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] comments in app-strings, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: NaN conflict (was Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?), Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: EDN b64'' fine points, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: cbor-edn-literals: Overview of string-ish with and without application-oriented literlas, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: EDN b64'' fine points, Rohan Mahy
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Anders Rundgren
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: EDN b64'' fine points, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: 2026-04-15 interim: EDN b64'' fine points, Anders Rundgren
• [Cbor] 2026-04-15 interim: Fast-track EDN extensions float'' and same<<>>?, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] 2026-04-15 interim: EDN b64'' fine points, Carsten Bormann
Apr 13 2026
• [Cbor] Re: (Standard) Partial CBOR Implementations, Laurence Lundblade
Apr 11 2026
• [Cbor] Re: (Standard) Partial CBOR Implementations, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: (Standard) Partial CBOR Implementations, Laurence Lundblade
Apr 10 2026
• [Cbor] Re: CBOR vs ASN.1, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: CBOR vs ASN.1, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: CBOR vs ASN.1, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: CBOR vs ASN.1, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Batch 1 draft for EDN application-extensions, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: CBOR vs ASN.1, Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] Re: CBOR vs ASN.1, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: CBOR vs ASN.1, Carl Wallace
• [Cbor] Re: (Standard) Partial CBOR Implementations, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: CBOR vs ASN.1, Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] Re: (Standard) Partial CBOR Implementations, Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] Re: (Standard) Partial CBOR Implementations, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] (Standard) Partial CBOR Implementations, Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] Re: EDN b64'' compatibility issue, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] EDN b64'' compatibility issue, Anders Rundgren
• [Cbor] Re: NaN conflict (was Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?), Anders Rundgren
Apr 09 2026
• [Cbor] Re: CBOR vs ASN.1, Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: NaN conflict (was Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?), Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: CBOR vs ASN.1, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: NaN conflict (was Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?), Anders Rundgren
• [Cbor] Re: CBOR vs ASN.1, Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] Re: CBOR vs ASN.1, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: NaN conflict (was Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?), Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] CBOR vs ASN.1, Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] Re: NaN conflict (was Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?), Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: NaN conflict (was Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?), Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] Re: NaN conflict (was Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?), Wolf McNally
• [Cbor] Reminder: CBOR WG Virtual Meeting on 2026-04-15, Barry Leiba
• [Cbor] Re: NaN conflict (was Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?), Anders Rundgren
Apr 08 2026
• [Cbor] Re: NaN conflict (was Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?), Wolf McNally
• [Cbor] Re: NaN conflict (was Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?), Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] NaN conflict (was Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?), Laurence Lundblade
Apr 07 2026
• [Cbor] Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?, Laurence Lundblade
• [Cbor] EDN-literals: Include float’’ application extension right away?, Carsten Bormann
Apr 06 2026
• [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-22.txt, internet-drafts
Apr 05 2026
• [Cbor] Re: EDN Issue #82 (Re: Order of processing for CBOR Working Group drafts), Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: EDN Issue #82 (Re: Order of processing for CBOR Working Group drafts), Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: Serialization examples / test (was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-serialization-05.txt), Anders Rundgren
Apr 02 2026
• [Cbor] Re: cbor-edn-literals: Overview of string-ish with and without application-oriented literlas, Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] Re: EDN Issue #82 (Re: Order of processing for CBOR Working Group drafts), Carsten Bormann
• [Cbor] cbor-edn-literals: Overview of string-ish with and without application-oriented literlas, Christian Amsüss
• [Cbor] Re: Serialization examples / test (was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-serialization-05.txt), Laurence Lundblade
Apr 01 2026
• [Cbor] Re: EDN Issue #82 (* comments *), Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: EDN Issue #82 (Re: Order of processing for CBOR Working Group drafts), Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: EDN Issue #82 (Re: Order of processing for CBOR Working Group drafts), Vadim Goncharov
• [Cbor] Re: EDN Issue #82 (Re: Order of processing for CBOR Working Group drafts), Rohan Mahy

---

[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]

---