Re: [104all] Further Clarification Re: IETF 104 Preliminary Agenda

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 26 February 2019 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 104all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 104all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A52127287; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 04:48:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5syTJcR-qv6x; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 04:48:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D896124BAA; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 04:48:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD9F3826A; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:48:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id A11F21DB1; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:48:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB341DA4; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:48:29 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
cc: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org, recentattendees@ietf.org, 104all@ietf.org, ietf-announce@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <BA691990-2FA5-43BC-A9AC-0D82025A6A3A@fugue.com>
References: <155089851917.5347.209761560453230605.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <23D062E4-4464-48C2-9464-61697C2351D6@cooperw.in> <A7B3EF23-DE19-4330-A660-D27744B95A34@gmail.com> <3a201a22-6ed2-ab83-5205-a28af7ba49d7@labn.net> <ea13d9b6-78bb-8067-d8f2-a7b98c5de307@pi.nu> <EE41BDFB-ED4E-4944-9E87-5E56766FAE37@cooperw.in> <2ad72bb2-6c16-f1a3-67b3-a25dfc641ce7@pi.nu> <DC65F7A3-413D-4787-8A3D-1B4C8440AE89@fugue.com> <9167b1c9-6385-35e0-69ff-91364150284f@pi.nu> <BA691990-2FA5-43BC-A9AC-0D82025A6A3A@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:48:29 -0500
Message-ID: <18499.1551185309@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/104all/gFxwNh_5hFd6oj_u_YpxaLThQkc>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:12:28 -0800
Subject: Re: [104all] Further Clarification Re: IETF 104 Preliminary Agenda
X-BeenThere: 104all@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Official Communication about IETF 104 <104all.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/104all>, <mailto:104all-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/104all/>
List-Post: <mailto:104all@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:104all-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104all>, <mailto:104all-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:48:34 -0000

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>; wrote:
    > they have good data. I’m saying they don’t have good data. The fact
    > that you have a conflict is not good data. It’s an anecdote. I don’t
    > have a conflict.
    > That’s also an anecdote. Anecdotes aren’t useful guidance here.

I also think that the RTG area has had very good conflict resolution in the
past, and that they don't have a lot of cross-area participants.  That is,
this agenda, which for many of us, is average for conflicts, is very
surprising for some RTG area people, because they suddendly are experiencing
what the rest of us have experienced for a decade.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>;, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-