IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Comments on draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-08

Yong-Geun Hong <yonggeun.hong@gmail.com> Thu, 14 November 2019 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <yonggeun.hong@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FEF120878 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:16:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N7cWegLY2MT5 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:16:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83093120868 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id j26so4277917lfh.7 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:16:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=d/H5tnIfCpkFLEDyGgdemq+KL0EzWslQMd1IMgxtXH8=; b=BArBubjcSmVcsryFFDEOAiISVNapKsG/wnAfjycUHMlmGJO16Ckv1usmmLAPiZLlNx WPyO4Bwn0bd55ZRpNCUrCRPRqS6cYXeEPbtTlZtTkcRwJd2VMNFk6ujSVUlzClAOEMYF gjWblF1TKw4riIyw4df1Szz0ZmiSeLJP0hV6npEoh6IG3lv3TlDjE9W8J8ZLjex1XQIf ar2V+StZUFeB5QuWAWgIxeJf/rD+Nc7ymQEcAKX7HOALfr3aLvrjl9PtfpE6wPuHD7g4 NoiLtGxQ44FswAult2j1F5iZFfl7d2HEPUvtEaSsR+oP/7Egb3bpBbBTMkvQ1+fZDrUN AsGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=d/H5tnIfCpkFLEDyGgdemq+KL0EzWslQMd1IMgxtXH8=; b=mxH1t6DtTkKJ+Egdzpro67A75v7jHXHCxFH50YiN9UKUH7Ptk6mKVSy2fXhmTGzSxJ Me1M9bM567zXCAGvQcYCZKedOAtbdRwhoCB0hM5Ujp5VxliCc/XM9K5NrDIog8fXHiSh vjUpfwBTway5z4MtxsEaxJdFSRhO2K3nHepEX40GV7JBII535PEHYw926+dT2Saa9s/r RZdNzrZWVV1SE9WcIrx7pOC5EcCFLi1w2blX90IKm+3cofhnc4mEZ0dhtUFTxqBrj8ks iTvNbLCj2VdTh+taessMmU9EV/dauR15nHa/dqo/CpYVx4YsmEFDuXp+RUDPLfiiY1A9 gndA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWdqyPrfTIZay1yyG0vsgSG8nYVgnyjgays6sr8PaJV5bsj9aEL Da9JJgNTW+U946l6PoGcQ2TUcD7VcQZa5mYR3pg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwsIuDr6my5vOV/C147AJUobCeRv+2xuWSiAF8SEA2ebJ4RBnipiEU1J6IHlY8lR6ddVsgf6QtkYcNzIr0cJGw=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5e86:: with SMTP id b6mr5722405lfq.96.1573719366627; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:16:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BB09947B5326FE42BA3918FA28765C2E010D344F@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <BB09947B5326FE42BA3918FA28765C2E010D344F@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Yong-Geun Hong <yonggeun.hong@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:15:55 +0900
Message-ID: <CACt2foGJo26JPfRqHx6Dtfffs6iF2LYo1ySsnJnG_H2FFD8OQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Liubing (Remy)" <remy.liubing@huawei.com>
Cc: 홍용근 <yghong@etri.re.kr>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d2f76505974a1728"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/1lo_LB4al2UEd8F61I5xPVPz36A>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Comments on draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-08
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:16:33 -0000

Dear Liubing.

Thanks for your valuable comments.
Your comments will be helpful to improve the draft.
Please, see inline response.

Best regards.

Yong-Geun.

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:12 AM Liubing (Remy) <remy.liubing@huawei.com>
wrote:

> Hello Yong-Geun,
>
> I've reviewed the latest version of the draft, and it looks great.
>
> I have some editorial comments for your consideration:
>
> -  Considering the current outline, the chapter 4 seems to be incomplete,
> because it covers only the PLCs. With the title "6lo Deployment Scenarios",
> it is expected to cover other low power technologies as well. Another
> solution could be, moving the current text to PLC related sections, e.g.
> the section 3.6 or the section 6.6.
>
[Yong-Geun] Yes, I agree. The main intension of the charter 4 is to
illustrate and list-up practical 6lo deployment scenarios and current
deployment scenarios in the charter 4 is only related to the PLC
technology. In a previous version of this draft, we had a deployment
scenarios of of jupitermesh and Wi-Sun but these are based on IEEE 802.15.4
specification and we had to remove jupitermesh and Wi-Sun to make narrow
down the scope of this draft. I hope other experts bring another 6lo
deployment scenario. If not, your suggestion could be a solution.

>
> -  In the chapter 5, for the bullet "Mesh or L3 routing", it would be
> better to have an example for mesh routing at L2, e.g. LOADng in G3 plc.
>
[Yong-Geun] Thanks, I will update the paragraph with your suggestion.

>
> Thanks again for your great efforts on the draft.
>
> Best regards,
> Remy
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email