IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time

"Lijo Thomas" <lijo@cdac.in> Tue, 17 July 2018 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <lijo@cdac.in>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F26130E31; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 06:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oZuRBxpyngAw; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 06:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailsender.cdac.in (mailsender.cdac.in [196.1.113.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 617C1130EAC; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 06:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ims.pune.cdac.in (ims.pune.cdac.in [10.208.1.15]) by mailsender.cdac.in (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id w6HD4C2X005005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:34:17 +0530
Received: from mailgw.pune.cdac.in ([10.208.1.4]) by ims.pune.cdac.in (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w6HD3gaA021132; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:33:42 +0530
X-AuthUser: lijo
Received: from LijoPC (lijo_new_pc.tvm.cdac.in [10.176.10.234]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailgw.pune.cdac.in (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w6HD3b2Y011092 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:33:38 +0530
From: Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>
To: 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, 'Gabriel Montenegro' <Gabriel.Montenegro=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, samita.chakrabarti=40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org, 6lo@ietf.org
Cc: 'Charlie Perkins' <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>, anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in, 'Malati Hegde' <malati@ece.iisc.ernet.in>, satishnaidu80@gmail.com
References: <152952824628.28544.9572509888577931520.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152952824628.28544.9572509888577931520.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:35:56 +0530
Message-ID: <004201d41dce$e99ff5f0$bcdfe1d0$@cdac.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQC2mo8LCRoHU27GiQUn5CkjyzRRAabOZ4HA
Content-Language: en-in
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-ID: w6HD3gaA021132
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-MCPCheck-IMS: MCP-Clean, MCP-Checker (score=0, required 1)
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.199, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_50 0.80, URIBL_BLOCKED 0.00), not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.799, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_50 0.00)
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-Information: Please contact npsfhelp@cdac.in/mailadmin@cdac.in for more information
X-MailScanner-ID: w6HD4C2X005005
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-From: lijo@cdac.in
X-CDAC-MailScanner-Spam-Status: No
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/Ez-JW8nJE3TpgOh98Vps_sxNv3M>
Subject: Re: [6lo] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:05:17 -0000

Dear 6lo chairs,

We wish to know how we could take our draft forward.

We will be happy to receive your suggestions  and move forward.

Thanks & Regards,
Lijo Thomas 

-----Original Message-----
From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org] 
Sent: 21 June 2018 02:27
To: draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time@ietf.org; 6lo-chairs@ietf.org; samitac.ietf@gmail.com
Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time


The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time has been changed to "WG
Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up" from "In WG Last Call" by Gabriel Montenegro:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time/


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ]

This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email
is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email