Re: [abfab] WGLC for draft-ietf-abfab-eapapplicability-02

On 04/09/2013 01:01 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I support publication.
> Section 4:
>
> One minor error:
>
>    fully mitigate the risk of NAS impersonation when these mechanisms
>       are used, it is RECOMMENDED that mutual channel bindings be used to
>          bind the authentications together as described in
> 	    [I-D.ietf-emu-crypto-bind].  When doing channel binding it is
> 	       REQUIRED that the authenticator is not able to modify the channel
> 	          binding data passed between the peer to the authenticator as part of
> 		     the authentication process.
> 		     
>
> Don't you mean cryptographic binding there?  
>
> I also believe that a reference to RFC 6919 section 1 MAY WISH TO be
> considered for section 1.1.  There are a lot of MUSTs is section 2. I
> don't support any text changes to section 2.
> _______________________________________________
> abfab mailing list
> abfab@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
These sound like minor last-call comments that Joe can incorporate
before IETF LC.

        Cheers Leif