IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [abfab] WGLC for draft-ietf-abfab-eapapplicability-02

"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Wed, 10 April 2013 01:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E7821F98C8 for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EW8NAoNQZEGX for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.pacifier.net (smtp1.pacifier.net [64.255.237.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B74621F98C4 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Philemon (mail.augustcellars.com [50.34.17.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp1.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA7352C9BE; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Sam Hartman' <hartmans@painless-security.com>
References: <3F295BEE-3638-49E9-9225-EBC3E9DFD777@cisco.com> <010801ce3588$74ed3490$5ec79db0$@augustcellars.com> <tsl61zv9ofn.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tsl61zv9ofn.fsf@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:29:32 -0700
Message-ID: <011201ce358a$dcb23ab0$9616b010$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQE/VcaE13Vi2PYoBawL7KdheYGLAAG1UeVeAi/BTDaZzUC4sA==
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: abfab@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [abfab] WGLC for draft-ietf-abfab-eapapplicability-02
X-BeenThere: abfab@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Bridging, Federated Authentication Beyond \(the web\)" <abfab.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/abfab>
List-Post: <mailto:abfab@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:30:16 -0000

We could still be, it was not clear to me that this was still a true
statement.

The headers also do not explicitly state that we are doing an update to that
although the document does still speak in those terms. 

It was also not clear to me if this was still going to be a true statement
given the removal of all of the other update texts.

I would be happy if this document does do an update.  We need to make sure
that it is explicit to everybody that this is going to happen.

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Hartman [mailto:hartmans@painless-security.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 6:15 PM
> To: Jim Schaad
> Cc: 'Klaas Wierenga'; abfab@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [abfab] WGLC for draft-ietf-abfab-eapapplicability-02
> 
> >>>>> "Jim" == Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> writes:
> 
>     Jim> I support.  Minor comment.  This is really a question of
>     Jim> process.  I think the first sentence in section 3 might need to
>     Jim> be removed or modified if we are no longer updating RFC 3748.
> 
> I missed that we are no longer updating 3748.
> how did that come about; I don't think I agree with that decision.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email