IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] Adrian Farrel's Block on charter-ietf-ace-00-00: (with BLOCK)

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 15 May 2014 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891E41A042C; Thu, 15 May 2014 01:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S0LrULIu1Jr2; Thu, 15 May 2014 01:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007DF1A0429; Thu, 15 May 2014 01:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E802CC5D; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:37:17 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XpcKrMsxKja8; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:37:16 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3332CC48; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:37:16 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKU8x538usM20gAwdt3JHmDCfi5JLMfQzTyjz0Y3+U69w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:37:18 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4A5C6102-3FF9-4450-AD17-D948E6934525@piuha.net>
References: <20140513113751.2586.57851.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <34966E97BE8AD64EAE9D3D6E4DEE36F252B29491@SZXEMA501-MBS.china.huawei.com> <005501cf6eda$60c8ec20$225ac460$@olddog.co.uk> <34966E97BE8AD64EAE9D3D6E4DEE36F252B29578@SZXEMA501-MBS.china.huawei.com> <CALaySJK7A4svMbWdaEAhQLniFH5eFBZ82AZKNgLt2xzxthcgXw@mail.gmail.com> <316A10E3-5AC5-4CF2-B90F-9ED32AE6BE82@piuha.net> <CALaySJKU8x538usM20gAwdt3JHmDCfi5JLMfQzTyjz0Y3+U69w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/3ZeqG2HoZzaaCGDb6bRV0NY00r0
Cc: "adrian@olddog.co.uk Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Adrian Farrel's Block on charter-ietf-ace-00-00: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 08:37:29 -0000

> I understand, but I think it's always been the intent for this work to
> start at the App layer only, and to consider looking at other
> protocols and layers later.

Well, what I wanted to look at was on the applications layer (e.g., data object security), not on other layers.

> I would want us to get this work done
> first in any case, and then re-charter to go further.
> 
> If you disagree with that plan, let's talk about it and see where it brings us.

I do agree with the plan, but my point was that the original charter version was on that plan as well while still recognising the applicability of the results to other things. My opinion is that the previous version was better, and would probably get more of us interested in working on the topic.

Jari

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status