[Ace] Comments on ace key groupcomm -01

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Fri, 13 July 2018 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D416E130F1E; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4aH_DR_WTjOK; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F981130E6A; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude ( by mail2.augustcellars.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:35:06 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: <draft-palombini-ace-coap-pubsub-profile@ietf.org>
CC: 'ace' <ace@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:38:28 -0400
Message-ID: <013e01d41ad8$b2ce7540$186b5fc0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdQaKsDewY+WehuqT9eenvy1Jp1rRw==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: []
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/IgXv1K7Cc_EKzT_2hPhIkMfwIcA>
Subject: [Ace] Comments on ace key groupcomm -01
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:38:42 -0000

* Section 2 - client  - write rights and/or read rights.  Unless you think
that write implies read in which case you should state that

* Section 2 - KDC - should also say what it does in the later parts - 

* Section 2 - Dispatcher - If this is a bus, then you are not really
communicating with it securely.  Anybody can write on it, but people will
just ignore what comes out the other end.

* Section 3-  A brief description of all of the operations would be

* Section 3.1 - Can I get authorization for multiple items at a single time?

* Section 3.1 - Does it make sense to allow for multiple audiences to be on
a single KDC?  

* Section 4.x  - cnf - text does not allow for key identifier

* Section X.X - Define a new cnf method to hold the OSCORE context
parameters - should it be a normal COSE_Key or something new just to makes
sure that it is different.

* Section 3.X - I am not sure if write or POST is a better answer for what
the role being requested is.

* Section 4 - Should one talk about the ability to use OBSERVE as part of
key distribution?

* Section 4.x - I am having a hard time trying to figure out the difference
between a group and a topic.  The text does not always seem to distinguish
these well.

* Seciton 4.1 - POP on client key  esp if bound to an identity (Note using
it to access the KDC is one POP)

* Section 4.2 - why not use the exp field from OAUTH in the response

* Question - does somebody talk about doing key derivation for a new kid
showing up and by the way where is the gid

* Seciton 4.2 - if you are using profile, then you should return it

* Introduction - introduce the concept of a key management protocol and
point to some.  Give some basic properties expected from one.

* Section 5.2 - What is the message to leave - can I leave one scope but not
another?  Can I just give up a role?

* Seciton 6.1 - assumes scopes are unique across all audiences.  Or assumes
that I look up the correct token - should have an argument about why this is
possible so that people can implement it right

* Comment somewhere about getting strike zones setup correctly for a newly
seen sender of messages. Ptr to OSCORE?