Re: [Ace] Transporting different types of cnf objects - CBOR vs JSON

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 03 October 2019 11:25 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4532612011C for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 04:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PgI0FQ_BxG1Z for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 04:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B06E12011A for <ace@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 04:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.159.97.60] (ewa_guest_internet_sthlm_nat2.ericsson.net [192.176.1.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46kVzX3WcGz10mQ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 13:25:12 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR08MB5360B971D9424FA5AB652595FA9F0@VI1PR08MB5360.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 13:25:12 +0200
Cc: Cigdem Sengul <cigdem.sengul@gmail.com>, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, Ludwig Seitz <ludwig.seitz@ri.se>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 591794710.3982821-ace45cb2c47b0ab58ca2605aead3b220
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <55C2AFB2-4247-4752-92A7-310A13460674@tzi.org>
References: <000201d51814$34a85fc0$9df91f40$@augustcellars.com> <9a0bbcd4-6055-729c-7ca8-205d0a1fd681@ri.se> <010901d51b04$92788a10$b7699e30$@augustcellars.com> <CAA7SwCPunMN6S0xwVd0nCKx_zwdGbgj-UVPOa7hRq6gMv7WUAg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA7SwCO_jb8aFW+hX9sf6pxm07=LGZ2tLtwv6u92k11zyexVbw@mail.gmail.com> <586CDF5F-F0E4-4514-8AB7-AAA383CA23FB@tzi.org> <VI1PR08MB5360B971D9424FA5AB652595FA9F0@VI1PR08MB5360.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/gQuAu3CWGJ2xjalkY0_lZ4AUtsQ>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Transporting different types of cnf objects - CBOR vs JSON
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:25:17 -0000

On Oct 3, 2019, at 08:42, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>; wrote:
> 
> but for HTTP we decided to do the work on OAuth, where it got stuck because the IoT-interested people are not there and the Web folks want something else.

…so should we organize a mass-walkin of the ACE people at the OAuth meeting in Bangkok?

Is there a good way to find out what the Web people want and why?

Grüße, Carsten