IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-star

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Thu, 12 September 2019 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0771200B3 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PC8qIPL3XvjE for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ADC712008B for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x8CDuxlo004743; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:56:59 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu x8CDuxlo004743
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1568296619; bh=A5d9affEvv3hPciglKe3UIDkIyE9woTeZwzMtuqcaJY=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gBnoNIvrOZ2r/W296sa1F48+0+zwXy7yaQkQfVVr+jXduEsfbz821ol4HOOHVeTAD Kw8Hsnr46Rm4e9mV+470h+WLXE2KvgFIk4YGX/cj/6c9bKp+lCwoShycKHEuQhvpSR PSdrmuj+f0QL3iaKQJON7dDfFUl7IKuxMwLWMX0Q=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x8CDutEa001937; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:56:55 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:56:55 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
CC: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-star
Thread-Index: AQHVXbA/av8Oo5ErBUOraknsVnX+VqcjVTCAgADyhICAAAP3AIACsmyAgAAZb4CAAS0ggP//4P9A
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:56:54 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3452BEA@marathon>
References: <CAL02cgST77G9uR23x4Hf0L8_hqi6zSuJqB=dbunGYcDPEDpbDg@mail.gmail.com> <94D1B74E-8AD8-4623-8DFB-E9C132BBB940@arm.com> <CAL02cgTM+dTJ6enzpnb=dSCzbDMR+3Xadp4r4a3xuzzhxPgJag@mail.gmail.com> <1D779B7D-3661-49B6-BC75-A41B69F3768F@akamai.com> <81C03A03-8189-4BB6-A4B1-131B25831ED7@arm.com> <1597512E-97DC-4BAE-9B4A-A830E1505DD2@akamai.com> <F12F3A27-BED9-4213-AFD8-0425F2029023@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <F12F3A27-BED9-4213-AFD8-0425F2029023@arm.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/DAx5ao6clwnDFfus9JayEgZneUk>
Subject: Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-star
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:57:12 -0000

Hi!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Acme [mailto:acme-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Fossati
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 7:38 AM
> To: Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>; Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
> Cc: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>; Thomas Fossati
> <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-star
> 
> On 11/09/2019, 18:40, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> > > the protocol is still correct/consistent.  But, let's be bold as
> > > it's probably worth taking the risk :-)
> >
> > We can ask that the IESG/IETF do a simultaneous re-review period of
> > something like two weeks.
> 
> Sounds good, thank you.

I concur with the spirit of the thinking here.  However, "IETF re-review" and IESG review are distinct activities that should not run in parallel.  If we want to conduct another IETF LC, no problem -- also consider another WGLC if appropriate.  However, all of these reviews should conclude before bringing it to the IESG for review.  By the time it gets to the IESG, the WG should have consensus and the broader community should have had their chance to review and resolve issues as well.

Roman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email