[Acme] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dns-account-label-00.txt
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 26 November 2024 22:41 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF0CC1D5C49 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:41:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lA4qsE2PZ5Vi for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:41:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0CA7C338177 for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:40:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu (c-73-235-241-23.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.235.241.23]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 4AQMe92f005915 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:40:12 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mit.edu; s=outgoing; t=1732660812; bh=5SUgqwFr0fsX8UAd8+Fs25qZ/yKpKOvW0f3xFJkYALc=; h=Date:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OY5iSrygQb/Bxm7ZUj/asVX8lAVYnCVBOT4JNht/WYAyW0QLnFQAwiWhIyFrrCFmH RUOSLyORH3lQ3y4QkiXfLmAKbVCSkpEibCkvQGFlFt+4Y9pkEJG6FgH2GAhS8xV1Aq QwQ04KmiSxrmqg4d8Mxq2r+JQYleIu3A1FF7eU3uriwYyzR24oRrbvzw+5WzHISlX/ k+047d5cAmawhHr8LGqPZnHzAfpy/ILNzTvyKGluzvgD1/zn/c1jkIAsoqH+inAlBq t1oV/aoJ5F+uRkr+2M19K7uBUbFIZu05/C5oZ2hb7UHg/Qr//ONKgGV3TL56az6lft hXd0CH+/CLZbA==
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:40:09 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: acme@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Z0ZN3lcq-OOHrR92@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <173153791646.1068266.13137272409568943240@dt-datatracker-5f77bcf4bd-4q5pd>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <173153791646.1068266.13137272409568943240@dt-datatracker-5f77bcf4bd-4q5pd>
Message-ID-Hash: 6N66KRC5DKLHM7UI67MHK6VTTRUDRPYC
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6N66KRC5DKLHM7UI67MHK6VTTRUDRPYC
X-MailFrom: kaduk@mit.edu
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-acme.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Acme] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dns-account-label-00.txt
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/_NtXBZqB9P0EmDbhTwhJGTOz0hQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:acme-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:acme-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:acme-leave@ietf.org>
Hi all, This draft is marked as "Replaces: draft-ietf-acme-scoped-dns-challenges". Is the intent only to replace that document to the extent that it previously defined the dns-account-01 challenge (but to continue to progress draft-ietf-acme-scoped-dns-challenges for the dns-02 challenge)? I think the incorporation of the guidance from draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques back in February was good and would like to see it progress, but having draft-ietf-acme-scoped-dns-challenges marked as "replaced by" a document that does not cover dns-02 makes it look like dns-02 is not going to be pursued further. What are your plans for dns-02? Thanks, Ben On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 02:45:16PM -0800, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > Internet-Draft draft-ietf-acme-dns-account-label-00.txt is now available. It > is a work item of the Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) WG > of the IETF. > > Title: Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) DNS Labeled With ACME Account ID Challenge > Authors: Antonios A. Chariton > Amir A. Omidi > James Kasten > Fotis Loukos > Stanislaw A. Janikowski > Name: draft-ietf-acme-dns-account-label-00.txt > Pages: 9 > Dates: 2024-11-13 > > Abstract: > > This document outlines a new DNS-based challenge type for the ACME > protocol that enables multiple independent systems to authorize a > single domain name concurrently. By adding a unique label to the DNS > validation record name, the dns-account-01 challenge avoids CNAME > delegation conflicts inherent to the dns-01 challenge type. This is > particularly valuable for multi-region or multi-cloud deployments > that wish to rely upon DNS-based domain control validation and need > to independently obtain certificates for the same domain. > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dns-account-label/ > > There is also an HTMLized version available at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-acme-dns-account-label-00 > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to acme-leave@ietf.org
- [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dns-account-la… internet-drafts
- [Acme] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dns-accoun… Benjamin Kaduk