[alto] Referencing RFC 8259 in ALTO drafts under progress

Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com> Tue, 05 February 2019 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC62131199 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:33:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bZLX12aL4ftk for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:33:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F208D130EC0 for <alto@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:33:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id y56so3717450edd.11 for <alto@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 10:33:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xHpY1zbd+5VUayz8ODcunud6rVoDZabXUp3Gf1rYPm8=; b=eW9hDb7MyeLRYQvGwPOxGlR6SO+cehwRZHPj3vFIRniUApEJSvAUW0eZoNQFz5BmWk KZXa/mDCKqJFlu27w6U+Jj3Hl1NHALq76MD5ioI/ulNmL1Quq7O0N3ceM3EqPC9tfsSN dhIP26PWQMaA4UMISkx5Aq8pTm8imCoy5B6REbkqxkMzlzcTjhBunseYCaaZCXgAk0fx lXz5ZnPzlWDqL19Lufb1WflnSbjN5zlUiRLcLPz0N4x2Edrq6GQadNSY+l+PPGMJGsp5 kcgYa9qkjUorq/i2K5aH+aSbXoMxI/+mNUr4KfR44jkt+cFigZO/uwjGV238g+AzneCv 4oPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xHpY1zbd+5VUayz8ODcunud6rVoDZabXUp3Gf1rYPm8=; b=UuVTKZMFyK43O1CK5xUUOuxY8xYuEYfq14Ln7TymOU8tdZyCUavq6lR7NneqNZ/19e 3Lc0ENuzII8j4XvKitWcHydYpVw+Fcm/3iEiNinXPGCqYg1MXkZL2o00FUMzugbOu0Hm rlh24yjrYIcWxtj+gAvKIW680kDVjMArzCIVpkvzIoRnmh0e2XzmZsEwtXNNpwCbyNxS C5kFbyHevtc1rrVBakEJ9LnTOCAcPI3hEUOMzw3KQHB2Y+4mW8BsJqXJc9HxG9wycAzB LnqFCtN7WqPLgf3G3lJmObMwTO+kFMkLbg9e3HCGPOQrcu8ZpWCMVlSlV+r9udN4HQRi /YNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaE9m3E/x3rdOLbH/Z+l6lLhdktJjw4cG8oFLQSFMHyGoPa14m0 XaCTgdJRFZ9eoH0kZxnXisUY93Q7ECpgveD4DcHlp2bj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZrY1ZwX9fbkFUP2eSW4NjHNcSTgeBA2CVDqpX/GnaNvCScuvKM1EjJ7rPUVhrlDo2rF7/+2f8OAcrSlqbVcCU=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dace:: with SMTP id x14mr5256207eds.13.1549391633029; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 10:33:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:33:42 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMMTW_+AA1eaBOjW-auXri_VcDF6aT2avfWSTxYBELZe7HH4hA@mail.gmail.com>
To: alto@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e7a041058129d9ac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/OLd2q54mhLj6xKLOinDwIguj_1I>
Subject: [alto] Referencing RFC 8259 in ALTO drafts under progress
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 18:33:57 -0000

All: Based on my email to the list on ALTO and UTF-8 [1], I do not believe
that there is any need to modify RFC 7285 to handle UTF-8 as being
mandatory.

For all the writers of ALTO extensions and other ALTO I-Ds that require
JSON, please use RFC 8259 as the normative reference for JSON going forward.

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/EGuPfDqoYBv7H8grPXE0qtjQsGc

Thanks,

- vijay