Re: [Anima-bootstrap] alternate to domain-certificate-identifier missing from voucher yang
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 25 March 2017 16:00 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1CB129445 for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LLmrxCq-EhGD for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2BCD128BBB for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C95203B2 for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 12:23:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B79636E0 for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 12:00:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
to: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <13359.1490396849@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <32445.1490371740@dooku.sandelman.ca> <13359.1490396849@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 12:00:18 -0400
Message-ID: <10596.1490457618@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-bootstrap/wRZvan6f3-7DD_tpOniZWQya-os>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] alternate to domain-certificate-identifier missing from voucher yang
X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <anima-bootstrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-bootstrap/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 16:00:22 -0000
Kent explained the history of how we got to having the full certificate due to DTLS making that anchor certificate optional. I also realize that we can use the extensions in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7250#section-3 so that we can bind directly to public keys, which makes me happy. Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: > Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: >> Or can I? I don't think we got the reference in >> trusted-ca-certificate correct (and I don't have 5280 on the plane >> with me. Bad me, disk space is cheap) to check. I think that: An >> X.509 v3 certificate structure as specified by RFC 5280, Section 4 > Shouldn't it refer to: 4.2.1.2. Subject Key Identifier > We can include the literal DER encoding of the the public key, if we > want a *KEY* here. >> is too much, I think we just wanted the subjectKeyInfo as suggested by >> Sean Turner. > This is a hash of public key info. It was, again: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7093 > abstract: > This document specifies additional example methods for generating > Key Identifier values for use in the AKI (Authority Key Identifier) and > SKI (Subject Key Identifier) certificate extensions. > I think that domain-certificate-identifier could be specifying RFC7093 > DER. We have said DER and binary, and when translated to JSON, that > results in base64 encoding, and we sign that with PKCS7, I think. > Note that if we specify hash of public key, we have to use TLS key > agreement processes that include the public key itself. That's not a > big deal, but it would be wirth making sure that we can all of this for > RPK. > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= > IPv6 IoT consulting =- -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [Anima-bootstrap] alternate to domain-certificate… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] alternate to domain-certifi… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] alternate to domain-certifi… Michael Richardson