Re: [Anima] Primary ANIMA Agenda for IETF104

Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> Tue, 19 March 2019 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC21D1277D8 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ao6vdb8itdn5 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEC44124B0C for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EACBEA95F5B2E6DE6AAC for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 01:12:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.52) by LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 01:12:27 +0000
Received: from lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.52) by lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 01:12:27 +0000
Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 01:12:27 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:12:20 +0800
From: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Anima] Primary ANIMA Agenda for IETF104
Thread-Index: AdTdObvLNNPGxfONQYycr+YuT3ewhQAIa2QAACUf3/A=
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 01:12:20 +0000
Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B929038D909@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B929038D395@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <32057.1552922578@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <32057.1552922578@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.185.119]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/E3qiFfWuOoIBUT0BHqBn8eFUmFw>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Primary ANIMA Agenda for IETF104
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 01:12:32 -0000

>     > PS, Michael R. & Peter, I am fine to move your WG documents, BRSKI and
>     > Constrained Voucher into the BRSKI relevant work sub-session with the
>     > same time length. In that way, you may save some time for other
>     > relevant discussion you want.
> 
> yes, that's a good idea.  I don't need 10 minutes for BRSKI status update.
> 5 minutes will do.

I will change the order in the draft agenda, but not re-allocate the time length. You guys are welcome to shorten, not elongate, your own presentation. In that way, we can have more time to discuss at the end of sub-session.

> We can't have a substantive conversation about it in ten minutes anyway.
> I'd sure like to see some replies to my email last week (BCC'ed to the
> reviewers) about the -19 document.
> 
> 3.    Potential New Charter Unscrambling - 30 min
> 14:20 - 14:50, by co-chairs
> 
> Perhaps we could subdivide this item into three sub-items so that we can be sure
> to get through it?  Could Toerless post his slides sooner?
> Is the intent for it to be mostly mic line?

Yes, mic line would be part of it. The WG should have chance to comment. However, giving the proposed charter has been baked for a long while. This may end up soon. Let's see.

Regards,

Sheng

> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works  -=
> IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
>