IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Need WG input: Alexy Melnikov's suggestion on GRASP

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 29 May 2017 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F27127873 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 11:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DiWKHM-lybJb for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 11:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7049A1292FD for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 May 2017 11:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18AA200A1; Mon, 29 May 2017 14:49:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EA0636BB; Mon, 29 May 2017 14:49:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
cc: Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <05b21e01-d856-ded5-87ec-da9d0f983310@gmail.com>
References: <05b21e01-d856-ded5-87ec-da9d0f983310@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 14:49:04 -0400
Message-ID: <26917.1496083744@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/FgdsYA_oJ8Tcm6h4gI9iOxDX6QY>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Need WG input: Alexy Melnikov's suggestion on GRASP
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 18:49:08 -0000

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
    > I have started the process of going through IESG comments on the GRASP
    > draft.  Where something is editorial or obviously non-controversial, I
    > will not ask for input. But I do need input on some things, and here is
    > the first.  Please answer quickly; no answer will be taken to mean that
    > you don't care...

    > Alexy wrote:
    >>> uri-locator = [O_URI_LOCATOR, text]
    >>>
    >>> I suggest inclusion of optional transport protocol here to match
    >>> other locators and to follow best practices for not encoding
    >>> transport information in URIs.

    > That would become uri-locator = [O_URI_LOCATOR, text, transport-proto,
    > port-number]

    > Opinions? Objections?

If the resource is really at  https://example.com:9943/my/path

what would text, transport-proto be?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email