IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-review] Fwd: apps-review => appsdir

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Tue, 29 November 2011 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B3F1F0CD3 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:28:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QksXCF9Hz4Qq for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from peirce.dave.cridland.net (peirce.dave.cridland.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:882:2e0:81ff:fe29:d16a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87B91F0CC3 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (peirce.dave.cridland.net [127.0.0.1]) by peirce.dave.cridland.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4053D116808F; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:28:07 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at peirce.dave.cridland.net
Received: from peirce.dave.cridland.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (peirce.dave.cridland.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VF3e67P6OpAR; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:27:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from puncture (puncture.dave.cridland.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:882:221:85ff:fe3f:1696]) by peirce.dave.cridland.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ADF78116808D; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:27:47 +0000 (GMT)
References: <4ED52A29.4080604@stpeter.im> <4ED52A4D.5050502@stpeter.im> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C152A6@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C152A6@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <3373.1322598467.712718@puncture>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:27:47 +0000
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>, Apps Area Review List <apps-review@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; delsp="yes"; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Fwd: apps-review => appsdir
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:28:14 -0000

On Tue Nov 29 20:13:04 2011, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Going from "Review Team" to "Directorate" is cool, but have we hit  
> a glass ceiling?  Or is there something above this, like "APPS  
> Review Council", that we can look forward to?

Council, Board, Cabal, Mafia... These are all well and good, but  
everyone has those kinds of titles these days.

Maybe we can all become Knights Grandmaster of the Venerable Order Of  
Apps? That'd suit me, but then, I've never been the fussy type.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@cridland.net - xmpp:dwd@dave.cridland.net
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email