[appsdir] Initial App Area reviews needed

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 07 April 2015 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603E11B3581 for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 06:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4dVjwcIMs3e3 for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 06:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 314161B357E for <appsdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 06:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6377; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1428412803; x=1429622403; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject; bh=7VjsYZ4OACWM/1Udww0XorHtHnrsVO2kBx3FyLdehrs=; b=M12PEC32kxIyzkv2t4iW57K+ytFruiFHJHUul6zdYrdvK0bqFwmPlE7k gk/QVJSuUPtGbN1mmhfRY0M/oTSZsvuDBGPGnD6w2a+jM2mg6kYAp/hNJ 0zlV4murnHzIwJHlIrpd+F4Hji61pNnLFSWW2LlwFfHLWXNuGXxODrhMJ E=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CoBADj2CNV/xbLJq1SCoNaXIMVwjWHdwEBAQEBAX6ESEgNIB0WCwILAwIBAgFLDQgBARWIFg2lP49UlmYBAQgBAQEBHo9EBgsBg0CBRQWEV4oMg3+BM1eEDoIBgVeFP41FIoNxPDKBCoE4AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,538,1422921600"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="438353768"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2015 13:20:00 +0000
Received: from [10.61.199.132] ([10.61.199.132]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t37DK0f1010022; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 13:20:00 GMT
Message-ID: <5523D986.2070302@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 15:20:06 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "appsdir@ietf.org" <appsdir@ietf.org>, "Mankin, Allison" <amankin@verisign.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K5TVKhEfoXKvOhrdaIdbJnwlfGrBeWlk5"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/appsdir/8ccSLFDRISlmR5-xt2d6W51yzBk>
Subject: [appsdir] Initial App Area reviews needed
X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <appsdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/appsdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:appsdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:20:06 -0000

Hi everyone,

For those of you who weren't at the AppsArea lunch, one topic was apps
reviews.  We would like to try an experiment, which is to both identify
the skills needed for a proper review and a reviewer early in the life
cycle of a working group draft.  What follows is a list of recently
published -00 working group drafts.  I wonder if people could volunteer
to just quickly scan one of the following drafts, and email back to the
group only the following information:

  * The draft filename (draft-ietf-wg...-00.txt)
  * A gut feel as to how much attention it will need (and why)
  * The sorts of apps area skills required to properly do the review. 
    To get a feel for what people have listed, just go to our favorite
    little wiki
    <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate>
    and look in the expertise column.

Just pick one draft off the list below and send it round when you've
done.  If it takes you more than 10 minutes, something's probably gone
wrong.

Here's the list:

    draft-ietf-aqm-docsis-pie-00.txt
    draft-ietf-avtext-sdes-hdr-ext-00.txt
    draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-pe-ce-00.txt
    draft-ietf-calext-availability-00.txt
    draft-ietf-calext-extensions-00.txt
    draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-00.txt
    draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning-00.txt
    draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-00.txt
    draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-alg-agility-00.txt
    draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-00.txt
    draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-00.txt
    draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-dtls-srtp-00.txt
    draft-ietf-tokbind-https-00.txt
    draft-ietf-tokbind-protocol-00.txt
    draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization-00.txt

I'm going to pull the first one of the top as an example:

Name: draft-ietf-aqm-docsis-pie-00.txt
How much time attention it needs: not a lot.  It's a short draft that
mostly builds on the earlier PIE work.
What type of skills needed: "transporty" interactions with applications.


And I'll take it from there to find a reviewer.  What happens next is
that I'll assign a reviewer.  The idea is to find problems earlier
rather later.

Thanks very much in advance!

Eliot