Re: [arch-d] IAB Adoption of draft-nottingham-for-the-users-09
Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 31 July 2019 10:30 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA2A12009C for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h9rfSf1YbU0i for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADB8D12008C for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3214; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1564569038; x=1565778638; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=VETvCsbXPVaKf9ULGKUMfetn8PnadJA6sJ3tT+to8pM=; b=ZZyBSoAX1FzE+2L4b3CaDaEOTsbBnnGJx/bbcAlcitLTEXXohsb3s09w isxyJy3UVA0DUVFAdHB71Ps6NT7sLpcgz2FnBqC1I7ljv5Nk6wWed2APe 0kc1y4PJLouEHDR8B0inF7Afr6tENlCX4iwqGoLF0Es+IKZtf39oMMa05 s=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AKAABPbEFd/xbLJq1lGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBVQIBAQEBAQsBgRSBAkd4IBIqhB6IfIovhzSLSoYFgXsCBwEBAQkDAQEvAQGEQAKCbjYHDgEDAQEEAQECAQZthSqFSgEBAQECASNWBQsLBAEJCioCAlcGE4MiAYF7D60EgTKFSIRcEIE0AYFQiiaBf4ERJx+CTD6HTzKCJgSVA5YJCYIcgh+BDpBsG5gWoheDDAIEBgUCFYFXAi8+gRozGggbFWUBgVloPpBKPQMwj1EBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,329,1559520000"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="14855367"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 31 Jul 2019 10:30:36 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-107-110.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-107-110.cisco.com [10.61.107.110]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6VAUZlC006498 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:30:36 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <DFDFDEA5-57B5-4E45-BBE6-4DD2220DFAC6@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4B61A114-1209-4A25-8363-25E6A75269E6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:30:35 +0200
In-Reply-To: <D8E41D2E-A8D8-4CAE-8496-A2C0C74F387B@dkutscher.net>
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
To: Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net>
References: <156380456143.28003.13657497823254748554.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D8E41D2E-A8D8-4CAE-8496-A2C0C74F387B@dkutscher.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.107.110, dhcp-10-61-107-110.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/iNi2dHdAUZ39HHcawVU7xkqfj1o>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] IAB Adoption of draft-nottingham-for-the-users-09
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:30:41 -0000
> On 31 Jul 2019, at 11:55, Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net> wrote: > > That means, the “what is good for the end user” argument will have to be fought out for almost every design decision. Perhaps this is what the draft should say? To me, that is an important aspect. It’s good for this tussle to play out. Mark has done a really good job of growing this concept. What we didn’t get to do at the f2f meeting in Montreal is establish a venue for how to discuss, and whether PRs would be entertained. IMHO it’s also worth some face time, but that’s me.
- [arch-d] IAB Adoption of draft-nottingham-for-the… IAB Executive Administrative Manager
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Adoption of draft-nottingham-for… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Adoption of draft-nottingham-for… Eliot Lear
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Adoption of draft-nottingham-for… Jefsey
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Adoption of draft-nottingham-for… Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Adoption of draft-nottingham-for… Eliot Lear
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Adoption of draft-nottingham-for… Marie-Jose Montpetit