[art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-16

Cullen Jennings via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 06 February 2022 21:40 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Cullen Jennings via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <164418360967.24977.17268842252865901665@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2022 13:40:09 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/beMjluUNRnbT8PWBIQ35pATPVBg>
Subject: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-16

Reviewer: Cullen Jennings
Review result: Ready

This draft does not raise any issues specific to the ART area.

The use of non UTF symbolic names is appropriate for this use case so I do not
see any issues with strings. I view printable ascii as fairly well defined but
if you want to be clearer, you could say  0x20 to 0x7E.

As an outside reader not involved with the spring WG, this draft was relatively
easy to understand. I do not see any problems with publication.

[art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-sprin… Cullen Jennings via Datatracker
Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-s… Ketan Talaulikar
Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-s… Francesca Palombini
Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-s… Ketan Talaulikar