Re: [art] [dbound] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS (RDBD) Draft
"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Wed, 27 February 2019 17:26 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D804E131024 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:26:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mVLUW2r1wstr for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65FB3130FE9 for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 6603 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2019 17:26:04 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=19c9.5c76c82c.k1902; bh=gsj/sSnUx7UarQGRiLuChokyrtrivXWnc98xnQd9dRg=; b=bbJrCx5MXwxvwkhxKfIQ5wFE9tFtBwwtepzwfO8XeNBJh3+754a9k/uiqsZzSNXsDL9vmIeRlWUD8XDiUqiW05cXmYcT7KrFfFjs0p3oVf/+XJ/VcnigZnzR6krGp/8XV2vrmnT+mccKfJjo+Vz577bXKvmvNiGsyAfYaigL8eZLJd7sq1tM/ZS8UQK+pu3Ma+2LrYCakoT+ja3cs/eDiY5LJTRwWV/A+utQGEoamCu8WyQ4/mQgKMkJfIK3zitN
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 27 Feb 2019 17:26:04 -0000
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:26:03 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1902271223230.16715@ary.local>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
Reply-To: dbound@ietf.org
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, "dbound@ietf.org" <dbound@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <8cbf0062-35c6-a8bd-e809-c6a5e9ce16c8@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <5de9ba1c3ae34edb9c7f39e0e9c3b143@PACDCEX19.cable.comcast.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902270920580.8896@bofh.nohats.ca> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902271037500.21061@bofh.nohats.ca> <8cbf0062-35c6-a8bd-e809-c6a5e9ce16c8@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/myF2wwnXBRd9psBx4mjeJcGKPCM>
Subject: Re: [art] [dbound] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS (RDBD) Draft
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:26:07 -0000
> new signatures), I myself only copped on that this could > be of some use where the primary has DNSSEC but where the > secondary doesn't, which is maybe interesting. In that case, the primary can just publish pointers to the secondaries, and we're done. The DKIM-like signatures have an odd model where the primary has enough control over its DNS to publish the validation key, and enough to give the secondaries signed records for their names they can publish that point back to that key, but not enough just to publish the secondaries' names directly. I don't get it. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
- [art] Related Domains By DNS (RDBD) Draft Brotman, Alexander
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS (RDBD) D… Paul Wouters
- Re: [art] [dbound] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS… Brotman, Alexander
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS (RDBD) D… Paul Wouters
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS (RDBD) D… Paul Wouters
- Re: [art] [dbound] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [art] [dbound] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS (RDBD) D… Tony Finch
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] [dbound] Related Domains By DNS… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] [dbound] Related Domains By DNS… Paul Wouters
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] [dbound] Related Domains By DNS… John Levine
- Re: [art] [dbound] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS… David Conrad
- Re: [art] [dbound] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS… John R. Levine
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] [dbound] Related Domains By DNS… Ted Lemon
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] [dbound] Related Domains By DNS… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] [dbound] Related Domains By DNS… John C Klensin
- Re: [art] [dbound] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS… Jothan Frakes
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS (RDBD) D… Michael J. Sheldon
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] [dbound] not DNAME, was Related… John R Levine
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] [dbound] Related Domains By DNS… John Levine
- Re: [art] [dbound] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [art] [dbound] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS… John R Levine
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] [dbound] not DNAME, was Related… John C Klensin
- Re: [art] [DNSOP] [dbound] not DNAME, was Related… Tony Finch