Re: Vp/clStats

"Michael H. Grobelch" <grobelch@cisco.com> Wed, 29 October 1997 20:09 UTC

Delivery-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 15:09:12 -0500
Return-Path: grobelch@cisco.com
Received: from ns.cnri.reston.va.us (cnri [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.7/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id PAA23126 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 15:09:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com (thumper.bellcore.com [128.96.41.1]) by ns.cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id PAA11016 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 15:12:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from diablo.cisco.com (diablo.cisco.com [171.68.223.106]) by thumper.bellcore.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA10301 for <atommib@thumper.bellcore.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 14:27:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.cisco.com (tuna.cisco.com [171.69.192.182]) by diablo.cisco.com (8.8.5/CISCO.SERVER.1.2) with ESMTP id LAA19174; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 11:26:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (grobelch@localhost) by tuna.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.2-SunOS.5.5.1.sun4/CISCO.WS.1.2) with SMTP id LAA17520; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 11:26:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199710291926.LAA17520@tuna.cisco.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: tuna.cisco.com: grobelch owned process doing -bs
X-Authentication-Warning: tuna.cisco.com: grobelch@localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Joseph P. Schlaerth" <jps@mtatm.ho.lucent.com>
cc: atommib@thumper.bellcore.com
Subject: Re: Vp/clStats
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 Oct 1997 09:29:50 EDT." <344CAE4E.5AEA0705@mtatm.ho.lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 11:26:31 -0800
From: "Michael H. Grobelch" <grobelch@cisco.com>

 >Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 09:29:50 -0400
 >From: "Joseph P. Schlaerth" <jps@mtatm.ho.lucent.com>;
 >To: atommib@thumper.bellcore.com
 >Subject: Vp/clStats
 >
 >atommibers,
 >
 >I have a couple questions on the ATM2-MIB.
 >
 >Do the atmVp/clStatTotalCellOuts and atmVp/clStatClp0CellOuts counters
 >refer to a) cells passed on the ingress side of a Vp/cl after processing
 >by a traffic policing entity OR b) the cells transmitted on the egress
 >side of a Vp/cl?

I believe (b).

 >
 >Is the traffic policing entity as described in this MIB meant to include
 >Early Packet Discard/PPD functions?

I would think not. 

Mike

 >
 >Thanks in advance
 >
 >Joe Schlaerth
 >Lucent Technologies