[auth48] [AD] Re: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25.txt

[Madison Church <[e-mail]>]

Hi Francesca (also adding current ART ADs to this thread),

This is a friendly reminder that we have received a new version of this document that is currently in AUTH48. Please see https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25 to review and approve these changes, as well as Carsten’s email below for more information.

Thank you!

Madison Church
RFC Production Center

> On Oct 14, 2025, at 10:51 AM, Lynne Bartholomew <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Francesca.
> 
> We received a New Version notification for this document.  This document is currently in the AUTH48 state.
> 
> Please review <https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25> and Carsten's email below (which provides background), and let us know if you approve of these updates.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Lynne Bartholomew
> RFC Production Center
> 
>> On Oct 13, 2025, at 2:00 AM, [e-mail] wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> A new version (-25) has been submitted for draft-ietf-asdf-sdf:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25.txt
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25.html
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-asdf-sdf/
>> 
>> Diff from previous version:
>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25
>> 
>> IETF Secretariat.
>> 
>> From: Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>
>> Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9880 <draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-24> for your review
>> Date: October 13, 2025 at 2:13:38 AM PDT
>> To: RFC Errata System <[e-mail]>
>> Cc: Michael Koster <[e-mail]>, Ari Keränen <[e-mail]>, [e-mail], [e-mail], Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Francesca Palombini <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
>> 
>> RFC-editor,
>> ART ADs,
>> 
>> On 2025-10-10, at 22:02, Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Please note that we are also preparing a -25, with two typo/C&P fixes and one more technical omission fixed (PR #187 to #189 in https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pulls)
>>> We previously prepared a -24 with PR #186 in it (technical omissions), which you already picked up.
>>> You probably need AD approval for all these.
>> 
>> We now submitted the -25, which is actually now composed of the changes in PR #187, #188, and #190 in https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pulls?q=is%3Apr (q.v.).
>> 
>> Note that the CDDL change in PR#190 triggers regeneration of the JSO.
>> Since the last regeneration, an underlying library of the conversion tool has made some JSON prettyprinting style adjustments.
>> These actually contain some improvements (wasting less space), so even though there is no semantic change in the JSO, we would like to use the newly regenerated version.
>> (We did test the regenerated JSO.)
>> 
>> As a result of checking in the regenerated JSO with these stylistic improvements, there is a large amount of change noise caused in the sourcecode element in Appendix B.
>> This is best solved by doing a wholesale replacement of the generated
>> text for the sourcecode element in Appendix B.
>> 
>> Apologies for causing that work.
>> 
>> Grüße, Carsten
>> 
>