IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Autoconf] call for presentation for IETF

Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> Mon, 25 October 2010 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B50A3A688D for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1iJs38Sr-3Bs for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507E73A680B for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so1900244eyd.31 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.30.20 with SMTP id s20mr3393313ebc.16.1288041699657; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.54] ([188.205.97.78]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q58sm8010352eeh.15.2010.10.25.14.21.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4CC53295.7010702@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:21:36 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <81BE4C83-80E5-409E-9337-6C0D76D87DBA@inf-net.nl>
References: <5EB91455-D51E-41BE-A077-8AFA5EDE4B15@gmail.com> <4CC53295.7010702@earthlink.net>
To: "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: "Autoconf autoconf@ietf.org" <autoconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] call for presentation for IETF
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:19:56 -0000

Charlie,
Interesting. 
Has the host a fixed relation to the router that provided the address?
What is the L-bit in RA?
How can two hosts without nearby router communicate?
How can other nodes in the network know a path to the host?
Regards, Teco


Op 25 okt 2010, om 09:32 heeft Charles E. Perkins het volgende geschreven:

> 
> Hello Ryuji,
> 
> Thomas and I have written a draft about enabling
> legacy hosts to participate in address autoconfiguration
> in ad hoc networks:
>   http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-perkins-autoconf-leghost-00.txt
> 
> I would like to request a time slot to present the
> main idea of this draft to the working group.
> 
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
> 
> 
> On 10/21/2010 10:14 PM, Ryuji Wakikawa wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> We have 2 hours meeting at Beijing.
>> 
>> -WEDNESDAY, November 10, 2010
>>  1300-1500 Afternoon Session
>> 
>> If you want to have a slot to present something, please send us an email.
>> 
>> thanks
>> ryuji
>> _______________________________________________
>> Autoconf mailing list
>> Autoconf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email