[AVTCORE] Weekly github digest (AVTCORE Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 25 May 2025 07:42 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: avt@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: avt@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A89A2CB3E74 for <avt@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 25 May 2025 00:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="cEX3Cpxn"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="GzQijGTb"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FxNU6R4pi_um for <avt@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 25 May 2025 00:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fout-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.149]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7AE82CB3597 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 May 2025 00:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.phl.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B111380120 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 May 2025 03:41:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 25 May 2025 03:41:42 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1748158902; x=1748245302; bh=/qjlSk0UWRRvUgN+yvzYluYk4jyBxM49fOF jPR3dwCA=; b=cEX3CpxnSpfY7a7XQEbuITsbB7DSEUVEcoEdX9wbWWVO48vJRaL eWFttHDAYe7rvaRLqPuLmBR7hL0cnGls48HERfBNPCTiSxDrIziDmV/7CwWiasRg BuhPjGQiTJHU7Hwgr1xAvqHGl1Z7TVfCD1ykkT38mACk9odqF6JvSkTBxj42c8ry rJgRg4x07IFMrFrMHlN1kL/RXnwvb8VL4u5ilavifKCqMRxMHUxbaT6/nvuUxqk8 KbwZubGfhGYkWcagzNV8H9id2cR5Z+ReGFgM19LWo+MdrYTDE/PxFawD2PPV2C+/ 3+Q8nGWk9MSN4/ci8Mo7/xmj/u/77W0916w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1748158902; x=1748245302; bh=/ qjlSk0UWRRvUgN+yvzYluYk4jyBxM49fOFjPR3dwCA=; b=GzQijGTb3wr7Hqbhb XafUNVpmVDRwNPNI1Wp2Q/T5AEeTblr0hDhJhSkQKode3K8XzOPc4zFVkX7GhC2S C1ikqh1qtQ8XqElUP1PWLLq96Z5TjyRUts6UlWYfrb8y9SOuLgiU3/8Two1SjcoB EEMOE5X+gOasWhCI9bBZPBycJSA2ktJ87qMnjqDI1EJCBHhBtyhzKLJqi9IAq4L0 RY1arHWdFjuKCy7sHYxXapyvnWSP5C+VjWNF+6BO5uRQTk8heTpb3ShN4QbCFA/r jvDy/jFVhbEogo/V7fzfNJHSpcWwrBvZw5dVfcCJbhjaQRKFgmtQTHaVnZ6jpcSw ASB/g==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:tskyaJ9thPH-auFgnePg2Xxzvb8RF0U-i9pzQs0bh48srvGjgkqw6g> <xme:tskyaNuiaQgZZLsslkTC_1MAS71nrCbsSJ6N3DbyEIRaW-Gm4VHn6BqWSeR2nrY3u 8PgJUI32KAO4NI9Jw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:tskyaHBxj4A1z0qvACa0PeaJgXFCFXcvIITSOCoPlhxiBXhowOuzHBFuK8fAwg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgddugedtvdculddtuddrgeefvddrtd dtmdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggft fghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftd dtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmnecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdt tdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumh hmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucgg tffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetff dvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgepgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvthdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhr tghpthhtoheprghvthesihgvthhfrdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:tskyaNdYIZVvJep8-XCp8USfRMhgPkFLqZFnAGhx7fl0rlRtJmgdYA> <xmx:tskyaOPBewnTGxhsR2d7vGkOxvyGagBneRdHb1u3wOAcDb3_bonVUQ> <xmx:tskyaPkbDlJobc919VjK2Ss7gSgcrLKgn6mx6ciRg59j_0X15t3nVg> <xmx:tskyaIswTceWgcFZsIpCmpcVUBUT1TObVJkYZhxUNTyvuUPVqFY8HQ> <xmx:tskyaPiVvWFdsr3BQvXF6Xdb1Vtq0mHbEttasqA609nCYNEMtKPhq2dW>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 May 2025 03:41:42 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============2158237012056029563=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: avt@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20250525074142.E7AE82CB3597@mail2.ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 00:41:42 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: GLPMCWCTSQUJTWABYNPGRFF2USA5MFBT
X-Message-ID-Hash: GLPMCWCTSQUJTWABYNPGRFF2USA5MFBT
X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-avt.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [AVTCORE] Weekly github digest (AVTCORE Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/P9PO43IbKgAn6h74IXflmEqvHCE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:avt-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:avt-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:avt-leave@ietf.org>
Issues
------
* ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-j2k-scl (+0/-0/š¬4)
3 issues received 4 new comments:
- #25 Media type parameter bounds (1 by hardaker)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-j2k-scl/issues/25 [for review]
- #24 Impact of non-conformance (1 by hardaker)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-j2k-scl/issues/24 [for review]
- #23 Acronyms (2 by gorryfair, hardaker)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-j2k-scl/issues/23 [for review]
* ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-hevc-webrtc (+0/-2/š¬3)
3 issues received 3 new comments:
- #32 Add constraint on Prefix-SEI placement in IRAP picture (1 by fippo)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-hevc-webrtc/issues/32
- #25 NALU TID values (1 by fippo)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-hevc-webrtc/issues/25 [PR exists] [AVTCORE Virtual Interim]
- #22 Issues with receive-only codecs (1 by fippo)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-hevc-webrtc/issues/22 [AVTCORE Virtual Interim]
2 issues closed:
- Issues with receive-only codecs https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-hevc-webrtc/issues/22 [AVTCORE Virtual Interim]
- NALU TID values https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-hevc-webrtc/issues/25 [PR exists] [AVTCORE Virtual Interim]
* ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-sframe (+6/-0/š¬0)
6 issues created:
- How can SFrame packetization support both per packet and per frame encryption? (by youennf)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-sframe/issues/6
- Does the processing model require using a media specific RTP packetization before encryption for frame based encryption? (by youennf)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-sframe/issues/5
- How are treated RTP headers in case of fragmentation? (by youennf)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-sframe/issues/4
- Does SFrame packetization need explicit fragmentation support? (by youennf)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-sframe/issues/3
- Should SDP allow negotiating the SFrame crypto suite? (by youennf)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-sframe/issues/2
- What should be the SDP granularity to negotiate SFrame? (by youennf)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-sframe/issues/1
Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-hevc-webrtc (+0/-0/š¬1)
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #17 Guidance on RPSI implementation (1 by fippo)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-hevc-webrtc/pull/17 [AVTCORE Virtual Interim]
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-haptics
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-j2k-scl
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-hevc-webrtc
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/id-abs-capture-timestamp
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/sdp-roq
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-sframe
--
To have a summary like this sent to your list, see: https://github.com/ietf-github-services/activity-summary
- [AVTCORE] Weekly github digest (AVTCORE Working Gā¦ Repository Activity Summary Bot