[AVTCORE] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-04: (with COMMENT)
Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 29 October 2019 11:24 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietf.org
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65783120145; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis@ietf.org, Ali Begen <ali.begen@networked.media>, avtcore-chairs@ietf.org, ali.begen@networked.media, avt@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.108.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <157234826341.6618.6097209580438306622.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:24:23 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/i_gttKlsT7ZnjVabfKV4wKVcm88>
Subject: [AVTCORE] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:24:23 -0000
Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for addressing the discusses and comments. I leave this comment, as something that could have been more explicit about decoding, however one skilled in the art will figure it out. A. Section 3.3: TSVCIS coder frames in a single RTP packet MAY be of different coder bitrates. With the exception for the variable length TSVCIS parameter frames, the coder rate bits in the trailing byte identify the contents and length as per Table 1. If I understand this correctly in an RTP payload that contain mulyiplr bit-rate frames the safest way of decoding this payload is to work from the end of the payload towards the start identifying a frame at a time. Then after having figured out how many frames actually are present, one can calculate the timestamp value for each frame.
- [AVTCORE] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on dra… Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
- Re: [AVTCORE] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on… victor.demjanenko
- Re: [AVTCORE] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on… Magnus Westerlund