[bcause] Stopping discussion? [Was: to wait or not to wait]
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 27 March 2019 22:05 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: bcause@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bcause@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7906012044A for <bcause@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cY_t9n6gqPVV for <bcause@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE647120438 for <bcause@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x2RM5mUj030262; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 22:05:48 GMT
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080E02203D; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 22:05:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6E6F2203C; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 22:05:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([193.86.203.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x2RM5k7m012134 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 22:05:47 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)'" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
Cc: bcause@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 22:05:46 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <0bac01d4e4e9$3b45cc90$b1d165b0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AdTk6JNv7WZ8dTAfStarTzWhj9J4nw==
X-Originating-IP: 193.86.203.3
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24516.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--1.752-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--1.752-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24516.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--1.752100-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: PA+/WlSmJls+D3J+ThgLRhz2MDiYujy5H181YDtIVap/y29NnT7OA9Nl PAQI8CHqGPtCd+WAW3Eg/ZeU3y59owtrOhDKumbSAP2Bflpd3h8JDfFL7Mvp7Szt4/lw8JZDJdO CnzRqry25A45mfJIBJF5IkTKFvb/EcdV1fv9AzTBbd1zMnVGjF47vhl9PIBCw550rfo9dgpa5/r Dl7C69Tspx30wDMdnPfQJb1mQE0l0w1qqYDEcGJOYAh37ZsBDCfS0Ip2eEHnwa2S8rkvtFcbDsz p3K5gqDjoczmuoPCq3slez0ntXDlQNoeUJIAnhvAKkGowlQXdMw8ox/9s6DVpQYfIV8qqZWD2zm 54D05gN5N9dWAs2KWRfBNsINvciO793uJTTYIwkl4nVYwIRGQa1+3JijYrAOMqmhG/M0o4/0MHw zu2JowBZt/2+KOWzz
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bcause/JQucSq9qFa5drbO2wvR2ilvN-0g>
Subject: [bcause] Stopping discussion? [Was: to wait or not to wait]
X-BeenThere: bcause@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bcause.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bcause>, <mailto:bcause-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bcause/>
List-Post: <mailto:bcause@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bcause-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bcause>, <mailto:bcause-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 22:05:52 -0000
Hi Wim,
> As mentioned we should stop this discussion, but we are going in circles.
Not sure if you missed a word ("not") or someone told you we should stop talking.
Going in circles is certainly not a good use of time. None of us should do that. We should always make sure our emails do not contribute to that, but should add something new from the last time we sent a mail. That may mean trying harder to understand what another person is saying.
But if my previous email about calming down has been interpreted as a request/instruction to stop then I am very sorry. All I meant was that we should all take a moment before dashing off a response email, and we should all work hard to defuse tensions and not accidentally ratchet them up. (I'm not sure I am in any position to give any instructions with regards to this mailing list!)
> The mailing list has given info to the IETF community and we will be advised
> how to proceed. So let’s wait for IETF’s decision.
The mailing list can continue to give information: I see nothing that set a deadline for emails!
Thanks,
Adrian
- [bcause] Stopping discussion? [Was: to wait or no… Adrian Farrel