[beepwg] Re: [Vortex] A couple of features to limit BEEP no reply attack

Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es> Fri, 13 March 2009 12:07 UTC

Return-Path: <beepwg-bounces@beepcore.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-beep-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-beep-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945FB3A6A11 for <ietfarch-beep-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <pAvxkpiUuSod>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Duplicate header field: "Cc"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pAvxkpiUuSod for <ietfarch-beep-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hl27.dinaserver.com (hl27.dinaserver.com [82.98.144.26]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1C53A69D4 for <beep-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hl27.dinaserver.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hl27.dinaserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C59D71692B; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:07:43 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: beepwg@beepcore.org
Delivered-To: beepwg-lista@hl27.dinaserver.com
Received: from dolphin.aspl.es (unknown [212.170.101.196]) by hl27.dinaserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A3A78FCC6 for <beepwg@beepcore.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:07:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.aspl.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1676C00A; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:05:49 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dolphin.aspl.es
Received: from dolphin.aspl.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dolphin.aspl.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OyUILSzPbs-E; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:05:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.132] (barracuda [10.0.0.4]) by dolphin.aspl.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB896C009; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:05:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es>
To: DEXTER <mydexterid@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49BA41BC.4070006@gmail.com>
References: <1236942381.17324.180.camel@vulcan.aspl.local> <49BA41BC.4070006@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Advanced Software Production Line, S.L.
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:06:57 +0100
Message-Id: <1236946017.17324.182.camel@vulcan.aspl.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DinaScanner: Libre de Virus, Este E-Mail no ha sido analizado.
X-DinaScanner-SpamCheck: no es spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, puntaje=-2.499, requerido 6, BAYES_00 -2.60, RDNS_NONE 0.10),
cc: vortex@lists.aspl.es
cc: BEEPwg <beepwg@beepcore.org>
Subject: [beepwg] Re: [Vortex] A couple of features to limit BEEP no reply attack
X-BeenThere: beepwg@beepcore.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: <beepwg.beepcore.org>
List-Help: <mailto:beepwg-request@beepcore.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:beepwg@beepcore.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://beepcore.org/mailman/listinfo/beepwg>, <mailto:beepwg-request@beepcore.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://beepcore.org/mailman/listinfo/beepwg>, <mailto:beepwg-request@beepcore.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: beepwg-bounces@beepcore.org
Errors-To: beepwg-bounces@beepcore.org
X-DinaScanner-Information: DinaScanner. Filtro anti-Spam y anti-Virus
X-MailScanner-ID: 4C59D71692B.4CE31
X-DinaScanner-From: beepwg-bounces@beepcore.org

> Hi Francis,

Balazs,

> I just ran through it quickly, but it sound really great. In the
> environment where we use BEEP we had to take care of this "manually"
> and
> it would be really great if that reply-limit was built in the
> protocol.

Thanks for your comments! 

> Balazs
> 
-- 
Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es>;
Advanced Software Production Line, S.L.