[bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03
John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Mon, 09 May 2016 15:00 UTC
Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5660912D521 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2016 08:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kxGXjwAP1WnQ for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2016 08:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0125.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA6F12D526 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2016 08:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=XervRAEYswum/Dmskz9EtR9U/sXi9JXEBZ/4fXrMmas=; b=bLlUfOegQGBSgCgbXjfPs2zBw/Q7RIEJ2jQKdVMRgQrHjoxGNzEWtX8iHeE7G7iTwSOVMZBUEikOPPrQQ/+HjYGsPobfMQzfaEP+oZLnM3bikhEbkrjT/YFUAr4HZX14ZzowJIxR8R6ST7F+bkm+TJmU4ZATIunDA/rBfdAi43s=
Received: from SN1PR0501MB1709.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.130.155) by SN1PR0501MB1711.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.130.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.492.11; Mon, 9 May 2016 15:00:26 +0000
Received: from SN1PR0501MB1709.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.130.155]) by SN1PR0501MB1709.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.130.155]) with mapi id 15.01.0492.011; Mon, 9 May 2016 15:00:25 +0000
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03
Thread-Index: AQHRprx+bkK/ZQpE60SQb+kN8uYCF5+qlgUAgAWmPgCAAAFDgIAAZgmAgAADVPCAABKLoA==
Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 15:00:25 +0000
Message-ID: <SN1PR0501MB1709DD24B90B52F014AA58CFC7700@SN1PR0501MB1709.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <572B2655.3020605@alcatel-lucent.com> <D3095B2F-072B-42CA-B160-DB4888DA02A7@alcatel-lucent.com> <57303CEE.8040104@orange.com> <7A432DD5-E28B-4670-B53E-2137A0A6E445@alcatel-lucent.com> <57309395.8090408@orange.com> <SN1PR0501MB1709149BA36C410EF7E46E52C7700@SN1PR0501MB1709.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR0501MB1709149BA36C410EF7E46E52C7700@SN1PR0501MB1709.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cd4cc12a-a1cf-4b90-0009-08d3781aa713
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR0501MB1711; 5:HkH/C41JggxKripieGJI2FF77NBaTHfI7dEh8I3wGM5ZiVXT0iclst2TJgy7eZrmWrNxD2dVqhz/OQUENf2udcHSI83QGYZkZ4FifyWO5H+yuAXgOZBZNkxsVqVqiSpM5F5/zasCdpiulGaEU7lw+w==; 24:FoS3uA+ZYQpf+nzQWCdMg7y7j7kLP5wVV1Xgi0wWwuUxqA05dq1DWWvV7VaQn4jK1wtfCdpTQb1SwAXGmEexG4D1OyCFOfk/EmQyEHYl0Ls=; 7:Xsg2ELCG7v3DnK4PPknOxUoI+w5Fg4KjCKacKxI8SCxHsyjhq49dHaVHsg7W9Cfb2fVY986SVXT3+iL1zXqyMAfHIRSAeXnHaxrF8RhA+fBsyep4dDyCUMtxooAMhykC2wF1CoSFCQeonW0j2jUeGKGbIWaXwGFgQ2fVdX7xTlqOnFSqvY1O/BrHwb3CJaog
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR0501MB1711;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN1PR0501MB1711EA22E7D41D6EEEC5FE73C7700@SN1PR0501MB1711.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(209352067349851)(138986009662008);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:SN1PR0501MB1711; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR0501MB1711;
x-forefront-prvs: 0937FB07C5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(377424004)(24454002)(13464003)(9170700001)(8936002)(5008740100001)(92566002)(19580405001)(107886002)(2950100001)(66066001)(19580395003)(2900100001)(106116001)(189998001)(1720100001)(87936001)(5002640100001)(77096005)(10400500002)(74316001)(5004730100002)(15975445007)(110136002)(81166005)(3846002)(230783001)(50986999)(99286002)(586003)(5003600100002)(1220700001)(450100001)(6116002)(102836003)(122556002)(3280700002)(33656002)(9686002)(2906002)(86362001)(76176999)(54356999)(76576001)(3660700001)(93886004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR0501MB1711; H:SN1PR0501MB1709.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 May 2016 15:00:25.5488 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR0501MB1711
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/lwM4Q3kp_iDi_-SrOiPcvG-T674>
Subject: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 15:00:29 -0000
FYI Yours Irrespectively, John -----Original Message----- From: John E Drake [mailto:jdrake@juniper.net] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 9:54 AM To: EXT - thomas.morin@orange.com; Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US); draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws@ietf.org; EXT Ali Sajassi (sajassi); EXT Sami Boutros Cc: BESS Chairs Subject: RE: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03 Thomas, Ali is planning to ask for the following code points: 0x04 (VPWS L2 Capabilities) 0x05 (E-Tree) 0x06 (DF Election) 0x07 (I-SID) Yours Irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Morin [mailto:thomas.morin@orange.com] > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 9:42 AM > To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US); draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws@ietf.org; > EXT Ali Sajassi (sajassi); EXT Sami Boutros > Cc: BESS Chairs > Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) > for draft-ietf-bess- > evpn-vpws-03 > > Hi Jorge, all, > > Follow-up my email on the list about the possible allocation conflict > with draft-ietf-bess- evpn-etree... > > Please let us (Martin and me) know how you evaluate this issue, and if > the WG can help in a resolution if need be. > > Best, > > -Thomas > > > > 2016-05-09, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US): > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Thank you. > > > > Ali, Sami, please let me know if you want me to fill out the form > > and apply for the sub- > type, or you prefer to do it. > > We also need to do it for Etree and DF Election. > > > > Thanks. > > Jorge > > > > > > On 5/9/16, 9:31 AM, "EXT Thomas Morin" <thomas.morin@orange.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Jorge, all, > >> > >> Jorge: > >>> 11) IANA considerations: the authors have agreed to request the > >>> value ‘4’ for the > Extended Community Sub-Type, since there are existing implementations using that value. > >> > >> Note that given the FCFS policy of this part of the registry [1], > >> you could ask for this value now without waiting and risking the > >> value to be assigned to something else. > >> The online form is: http://www.iana.org/form/protocol-assignment > >> > >> Once this is done the text is the IANA section in the draft would > >> become "IANA has allocated Type 0x06/Sub-Type 0x04 for the 'EVPN > >> Layer 2 attributes extended community' defined in section 3.1". > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> -Thomas > >> > >> [1] > >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-extended-communities/bgp-extend > >> ed > >> -communities.xhtml#evpn > >
- [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & sh… Martin Vigoureux
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … UTTARO, JAMES
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … Nabeel Cocker
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … Thomas Morin
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … thomas.morin
- [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status … John E Drake
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … John E Drake
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Sami Boutros
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Sami Boutros
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Sami Boutros
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … Martin Vigoureux
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … Sami Boutros
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Sami Boutros
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… UTTARO, JAMES
- Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem sta… Sami Boutros
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … Thomas.Beckhaus
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … Martin Vigoureux
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status … Sami Boutros