[Bier] 答复: 转发: New Version Notification for draft-xu-bier-non-mpls-encap-over-udp-00.txt
Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> Thu, 23 November 2017 06:52 UTC
Return-Path: <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDA6126D45 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 22:52:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xgKnCc2Z4oir for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 22:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39035126579 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 22:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D0C1923E4B9DB for <bier@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 06:52:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 06:52:12 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:52:09 +0800
From: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
To: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
CC: "BIER (bier@ietf.org)" <bier@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Bier] 转发: New Version Notification for draft-xu-bier-non-mpls-encap-over-udp-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTZAWafKQK08Ib20emZdq2me++zqMhQyzA//+GM4CAALn9gA==
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 06:52:08 +0000
Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE304900E4@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE30490013@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CA+wi2hNnAe6t8sceBqH5M+kX_03qm80ZzCAkzFzOu-pyHaRWyA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hNnAe6t8sceBqH5M+kX_03qm80ZzCAkzFzOu-pyHaRWyA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.184.181]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE304900E4NKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/J0FwIuxT6f3v1id_YditW4mIRW8>
Subject: [Bier] 答复: 转发: New Version Notification for draft-xu-bier-non-mpls-encap-over-udp-00.txt
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 06:52:17 -0000
Tony, Thanks for your quick review. I wonder whether the following suggestion would conflict with the two possible procedures as described in Section 6.9 of the just published RFC8279. Best regards, Xiaohu 发件人: Tony Przygienda [mailto:tonysietf@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2017年11月23日 11:33 收件人: Xuxiaohu 抄送: BIER (bier@ietf.org) 主题: Re: [Bier] 转发: New Version Notification for draft-xu-bier-non-mpls-encap-over-udp-00.txt I suggest to add a section pointing out that BIER is a hop-by-hop forwarding paradigm and the usual considerations apply when tunnels move the frames to other part of the network, e.g. in IGP control scheme the tunnels must be included in the according tree computation. --- tony On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com<mailto:xuxiaohu@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi all, Any comments and suggestions are welcome. Best regards, Xiaohu > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>] > 发送时间: 2017年11月23日 10:49 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu > 主题: New Version Notification for > draft-xu-bier-non-mpls-encap-over-udp-00.txt > > > A new version of I-D, draft-xu-bier-non-mpls-encap-over-udp-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Xiaohu Xu and posted to the IETF repository. > > Name: draft-xu-bier-non-mpls-encap-over-udp > Revision: 00 > Title: Encapsulating Non-MPLS-BIER in UDP > Document date: 2017-11-22 > Group: Individual Submission ....