[BLISS] call-completion issue 2004: Failure codes for CC SUBSCRIBE

["WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)" <[e-mail]>]

> > ** Technical
> > 
> > 
> > * 2004 Failure codes for CC SUBSCRIBE
> > 
> > [New for -05.]  The text is inconsistent regarding the 
> > failure code for a CC SUBSCRIBE for a call that the monitor 
> > has no record of:  7.2 says 404, 9.7 says 481.  It seems to 
> > me that 404 should be reserved for SUBSCRIBEs for which the 
> > monitor cannot identify the managed AOR, and 481 used for 
> > SUBSCRIBEs that designate a proper AOR but not a known call 
> > for that AOR.
> 
> I agree with your analysis. My proposal is to solve this inconsistency
> with a clear definition in subclause 9.7, and delete the regarding
> definitions from subclause 7.2, in order to avoid redundant
> specification.

Given that we are giving up on "call correlation", the monitor no longer produces 481 responses to new SUBSCRIBEs.  Removing that case from the two sections eliminates the inconsistency.

However, I think removing the redundancy is a good idea; the titles of the two sections make it clear that they are related, so a reader will have no difficulty finding the specification of response codes.

Dale