Re: [calsify] IPR Disclosure for draft-ietf-calext-caldav-attachments

Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu> Thu, 23 March 2017 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DA6129477; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hVgLZrA56tuQ; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.157.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28B381286AB; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.22] (cpe-74-77-85-250.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.85.250]) (user=murch mech=PLAIN (0 bits)) by smtp.andrew.cmu.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v2NJ3epv057211 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:03:41 -0400
To: Philipp Kewisch <kewisch@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-calext-caldav-attachments.authors@ietf.org
Cc: Calsify <calsify@ietf.org>
References: <0efdea51-526d-3fe1-cf3b-2059c3fb3b24@gmail.com>
From: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
Message-ID: <06ee9799-9401-e1b4-6c19-8187b75e21fe@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:03:40 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0efdea51-526d-3fe1-cf3b-2059c3fb3b24@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Version: 6.3.0.2556906, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2017.3.23.184816
X-SMTP-Spam-Clean: 28% ( SXL_IP_DYNAMIC 3, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_700_799 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, FROM_EDU_TLD 0, IN_REP_TO 0, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS 0, MSG_THREAD 0, MULTIPLE_REAL_RCPTS 0, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED 0, RDNS_POOLED 0, RDNS_RESIDENTIAL 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC 0, RDNS_SUSP_SPECIFIC 0, REFERENCES 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CC_NAME 0, __CC_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0, __CC_REAL_NAMES 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_CC_HDR 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT 0, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1 0, __RDNS_POOLED_1 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NAME 0, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0, __TO_REAL_NAMES 0, __USER_AGENT 0)
X-SMTP-Spam-Score: 28%
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 128.2.157.38
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/4DxG_F_n3wP5ph5oK9mLzmM9jXw>
Subject: Re: [calsify] IPR Disclosure for draft-ietf-calext-caldav-attachments
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:03:47 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.


On 03/22/2017 05:14 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
> Hello CalDAV Attachments Authors,
>
> I am preparing the shepherd writeup for
> draft-ietf-calext-caldav-attachments and would like to ask the
> obligatory question regarding IPR.
>
> Can you confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required
> for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have
> already been filed, and that you are not aware of any further IPR
> related to this draft?
>
> If anyone else is aware of undeclared IPR, please voice your concerns.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Philipp
>

-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University