[Capwap] WG, Please confirm whether RFC5415 support IPv4z and IPv6z

young <young@h3c.com> Tue, 26 January 2010 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <capwap-bounces+capwap-archive=lists.ietf.org@frascone.com>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-capwap-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-capwap-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17CA3A6818 for <ietfarch-capwap-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:17:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.69
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.69 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.309, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_31=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kZw1wAf2AAlJ for <ietfarch-capwap-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:17:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.tigertech.net (lists.tigertech.net [64.62.209.34]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E08E3A6810 for <capwap-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:17:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zoidberg.tigertech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zoidberg.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C9DE181CC for <capwap-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:17:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.tigertech.net (mx1.tigertech.net [64.62.209.31]) by lists.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2DAE240E1 for <capwap@lists.tigertech.net>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:17:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698EF3610002 for <capwap@frascone.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:17:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hgblob.tigertech.net
Received: from mx1.tigertech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A373610001 for <capwap@frascone.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:17:38 -0800 (PST)
X-TigerTech-Content-Filter: Clean
X-TigerTech-Spam-Status: Level 0 (High) (P0); Whitelisted TTSSA (young@h3c.com whitelisted)
Received: from huawei-3com.com (unknown [60.191.123.56]) by mx1.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for <capwap@frascone.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:17:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei-3com.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by h3cml02-in.huawei-3com.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0KWU00E3ZFHR5R@h3cml02-in.huawei-3com.com> for capwap@frascone.com; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:29:51 +0800 (CST)
Received: from h3cmta02-ds.h3c.com ([172.25.12.70]) by h3cml02-in.huawei-3com.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0KWU00I8DFHR2C@h3cml02-in.huawei-3com.com> for capwap@frascone.com; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:29:51 +0800 (CST)
Received: from smtp1.h3c.com ([172.25.14.252]) by h3cmta02-ds.h3c.com (Lotus Domino Release 8.5FP1) with ESMTP id 2010012615173556-1839839 ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:17:35 +0800
Received: from unknown (HELO s00338) ([10.154.68.122]) by smtp1.h3c.com with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:14:27 +0800
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:17:26 +0800
From: young <young@h3c.com>
To: capwap@frascone.com
Message-id: <006f01ca9e57$9d806060$7a449a0a@h3c.huawei3com.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6856
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on h3cmta02-ds/h3c(Release 8.5FP1|June 15, 2009) at 2010-01-26 15:17:35, Serialize by Router on h3cmta02-ds/h3c(Release 8.5FP1|June 15, 2009) at 2010-01-26 15:17:35, Serialize complete at 2010-01-26 15:17:35
Thread-index: AcqeV50JW0OiVx4YSf+owdadXf+Q4A==
Cc: pasi.eronen@nokia.com, Yong Zhang <yozhang@gmail.com>
Subject: [Capwap] WG, Please confirm whether RFC5415 support IPv4z and IPv6z
X-BeenThere: capwap@frascone.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for CAPWAP technical discussions <capwap.frascone.com>
List-Post: <mailto:capwap@frascone.com>
X-Tigertech-Mailman-Hint: 636170776170
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap>, <mailto:capwap-request@frascone.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap>, <mailto:capwap-request@frascone.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap>
List-Help: <mailto:capwap-request@frascone.com?subject=help>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: capwap-bounces+capwap-archive=lists.ietf.org@frascone.com

Hi, all:

Kindly do some favour and confirm whether CAPWAP protocol (RFC5415)
Supports IPv4z and IPv6z?

I give some info here from the perspective of MIB related RFCs.
When a MIB defines an Address type object (for example, WTP's address),
it requires to point out its address type (v4, v6 and so on)
RFC4001 already defined TC (InetAddressType) for IP address type, also give
the value list:
    SYNTAX       INTEGER {
                     unknown(0),
                     ipv4(1),
                     ipv6(2),
                     ipv4z(3),
                     ipv6z(4),
                     dns(16)
                 }
When a MIB object is defined with TC InetAddressType, it should specify
Which IP address type (ipv4, or so on) it exactly support.

MY question is: Whether CAPWAP supports the ipv4z and ipv6z?
Please also refer to Pasi's comments to the MIB draft:
////////////
capwapBaseWtpProfileWtpStaticIpType: How would the "ipv4z" type be used by
the CAPWAP protocol? (it doesn't seem to use the zone index in any way)

Could you give some guidance? I appreciate your help.

Regards
Richard

The related content in the RFC4001:
InetAddressType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A value that represents a type of Internet address.

         unknown(0)  An unknown address type.  This value MUST
                     be used if the value of the corresponding
                     InetAddress object is a zero-length string.
                     It may also be used to indicate an IP address
                     that is not in one of the formats defined
                     below.

         ipv4(1)     An IPv4 address as defined by the
                     InetAddressIPv4 textual convention.

         ipv6(2)     An IPv6 address as defined by the
                     InetAddressIPv6 textual convention.

         ipv4z(3)    A non-global IPv4 address including a zone
                     index as defined by the InetAddressIPv4z
                     textual convention.

         ipv6z(4)    A non-global IPv6 address including a zone
                     index as defined by the InetAddressIPv6z
                     textual convention.

         dns(16)     A DNS domain name as defined by the
                     InetAddressDNS textual convention.

         Each definition of a concrete InetAddressType value must be
         accompanied by a definition of a textual convention for use
         with that InetAddressType.

         To support future extensions, the InetAddressType textual
         convention SHOULD NOT be sub-typed in object type definitions.
         It MAY be sub-typed in compliance statements in order to
         require only a subset of these address types for a compliant
         implementation.

         Implementations must ensure that InetAddressType objects
         and any dependent objects (e.g., InetAddress objects) are
         consistent.  An inconsistentValue error must be generated
         if an attempt to change an InetAddressType object would,
         for example, lead to an undefined InetAddress value.  In



Daniele, et al.             Standards Track                  PAGE 6 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
RFC 4001          Internet Network Address Conventions     February 2005


         particular, InetAddressType/InetAddress pairs must be
         changed together if the address type changes (e.g., from
         ipv6(2) to ipv4(1))."
    SYNTAX       INTEGER {
                     unknown(0),
                     ipv4(1),
                     ipv6(2),
                     ipv4z(3),
                     ipv6z(4),
                     dns(16)
                 }



InetAddressIPv4z ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    DISPLAY-HINT "1d.1d.1d.1d%4d"
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "Represents a non-global IPv4 network address, together
         with its zone index:

           Octets   Contents         Encoding
            1-4     IPv4 address     network-byte order
            5-8     zone index       network-byte order

         The corresponding InetAddressType value is ipv4z(3).

         The zone index (bytes 5-8) is used to disambiguate identical
         address values on nodes that have interfaces attached to
         different zones of the same scope.  The zone index may contain
         the special value 0, which refers to the default zone for each
         scope.

         This textual convention SHOULD NOT be used directly in object



Daniele, et al.             Standards Track                  PAGE 8 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
RFC 4001          Internet Network Address Conventions     February 2005


         definitions, as it restricts addresses to a specific format.
         However, if it is used, it MAY be used either on its own or in
         conjunction with InetAddressType, as a pair."
    SYNTAX       OCTET STRING (SIZE (8))

InetAddressIPv6z ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    DISPLAY-HINT "2x:2x:2x:2x:2x:2x:2x:2x%4d"
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "Represents a non-global IPv6 network address, together
         with its zone index:

           Octets   Contents         Encoding
            1-16    IPv6 address     network-byte order
           17-20    zone index       network-byte order

         The corresponding InetAddressType value is ipv6z(4).

         The zone index (bytes 17-20) is used to disambiguate
         identical address values on nodes that have interfaces
         attached to different zones of the same scope.  The zone index
         may contain the special value 0, which refers to the default
         zone for each scope.

         This textual convention SHOULD NOT be used directly in object
         definitions, as it restricts addresses to a specific format.
         However, if it is used, it MAY be used either on its own or in
         conjunction with InetAddressType, as a pair."
    SYNTAX       OCTET STRING (SIZE (20))


Regards
Richard


_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap