Re: [Cbor] Appendix C of CBORBis

Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> Fri, 17 May 2019 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <lgl@island-resort.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A21E1201F3 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2019 16:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IfqRqh6wHwEZ for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2019 16:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa09-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa09-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 068D2120152 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 May 2019 16:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.82] ([76.192.164.238]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id Rm2GhqMC91w3PRm2GhAeRN; Fri, 17 May 2019 16:13:08 -0700
From: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
Message-Id: <802456D2-279B-40FD-93BC-98046243E6A3@island-resort.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0D2AC7B5-4F58-4CFD-99D3-B5BEF5051019"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 16:13:07 -0700
In-Reply-To: <90262C4A-1A64-4658-BD9B-B1847190D6A6@ericsson.com>
Cc: "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@chromium.org>
To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
References: <90262C4A-1A64-4658-BD9B-B1847190D6A6@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfP1Ba60mVKagv2zQrC1vp0NmsUL04uUAd74AXpYxy5Vj2AzNn2bfx0lwtDoRu1YBVKrLNNu6XXSFTGyx0+9yEtNDqK3wHIvk49CiY+RtSHEwuVVMAtf5 vccVWzc321v/0OjRHGWhsx1PYPEtxJrFPppSwxew/1ECuxDLSSDNKKjFtee2c4BzFo47M6Z8+4BGNzoXkL1BNtljvKZK6gAj0MBtsQO4sWu+2dPd4odoVfhu yPo6LE/HjGoJgwE4OQ9hXw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/CpG2o9blMFWz2aMNazjsCHSB0FE>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Appendix C of CBORBis
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 23:13:12 -0000

Looks right to me.

LL


> On May 17, 2019, at 5:24 AM, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>; wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
>  
> As an output of the discussion at IETF104, Carsten requested that Appendix C be reviewed by the wg, re “defensive enough”. In particular, Jeffrey and Laurence, who have heavily participated in the discussion, if you could read that up before next interim (22nd of May) that would be greatly appreciated.
>  
> https://cbor-wg.github.io/CBORbis/draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis.html#rfc.appendix.C <https://cbor-wg.github.io/CBORbis/draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis.html#rfc.appendix.C>
>  
> (If you need more context, IETF104 minutes: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/minutes-104-cbor-01.txt <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/minutes-104-cbor-01.txt> )
>  
> Thanks,
> Francesca
> _______________________________________________
> CBOR mailing list
> CBOR@ietf.org <mailto:CBOR@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>