Re: [CCAMP] IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Mon, 26 October 2015 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A4E1B512B for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B6lNV5SzZ7o7 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 248FD1B5112 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9004; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445886791; x=1447096391; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Nbl/hLQKe2S95gwuak6q5YDQmPKitLu06VMY/HMeX0I=; b=gkIv8CVq1ReBGGJYvEo6ZHAzVimkikHLTTMDD6iLeQhepor5DVc4YN+m oYG+ZrFfA4/5FAqKngkmv0dJg4l2w/Y0a0mXejrp2xe4RyBknv89C0dwF KUnSYZnWQxM5+dCpY+QTdhI7WeaBzIa1ATisdy0cKy2PWm8CFfe/QBL1f s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAgDfei5W/49dJa1egmlNVG8Gvj8BDYFaIYV8AoE3OBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEMgEBAQQtRwUQAgEIEQQBASgHMhQJCAEBBAENBQiIKA3FXwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARiGd4R+hCoRAVEGAQaEKAWWNgGFG4d/gWBIg3eSJ4NvAREOAQFChANyAYVXOoEGAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.20,201,1444694400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="39254995"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2015 19:13:09 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-020.cisco.com (xch-rcd-020.cisco.com [173.37.102.30]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9QJD9i2020153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:13:09 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-020.cisco.com (173.37.102.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:12:46 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:12:46 -0500
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, "Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant)" <abonfant@cisco.com>, "Fatai Zhang (zhangfatai@huawei.com)" <zhangfatai@huawei.com>, "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02
Thread-Index: AdENYAIyoPXfIuKHQzigVzyCE1CoqQCwj6ug
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:12:46 +0000
Message-ID: <89d1cfd2767942cfbb158db320122f7f@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AA04AE@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AA04AE@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.178]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_89d1cfd2767942cfbb158db320122f7fXCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/D0mPR81BoDTDRMIqx8dY0T3K3To>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:13:18 -0000

I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Cheers

Matt

From: Daniele Ceccarelli [mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 3:00 AM
To: Zafar Ali (zali) <zali@cisco.com>; Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant) <abonfant@cisco.com>; Matt Hartley (mhartley) <mhartley@cisco.com>; Fatai Zhang (zhangfatai@huawei.com) <zhangfatai@huawei.com>; CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02

Authors, Contributors, CCAMP

The OTN signal type sub-registry draft is stable since a while. This is to start the IPR polling in preparation for WG Last Call.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor.

NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
Daniele & Fatai