Re: [CCAMP] [Teas] Reply to ETSI communication on WIM

Young Lee <younglee.tx@gmail.com> Mon, 16 December 2019 04:39 UTC

Return-Path: <younglee.tx@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AF01200D5; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 20:39:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ek-sghJ7r6zr; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 20:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12f.google.com (mail-il1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2879D1200CC; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 20:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id g12so4387730ild.2; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 20:39:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PvKasO28yIGdXvNgUNOWV9bXveDC4gZi0FhJioByP4M=; b=pSjI5kC7IndqieP4JOVWqVA9L9LeE+GswP6hdAfIYaroqE5lzYEOgCBQTka60Nf5eg m0yUcqmuJfgk5IQmE4ZIKplZyYzcbGCFv60mNzstkM30Np2F56UJM9G6QwOSsgFyrCxi yO0BkY/kqGuhVezUv3jBJDPYjfu/WG85+kFXUu/Z9ohIR54cEr7OpHJDgn70rHwMwqWD 7v8W2udaZ4igxXutZJRvtIHbaauhFGC0VeDKDsQh8IPpdtKGLl71W3deYHJcQxtuF22Y 7+/jGUiMYGvh4cpohLpFqeUEIEfT7uJAygF7YkRN8NXTvDiwNGFn5b/BjzQtB/bAjlGS DOvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PvKasO28yIGdXvNgUNOWV9bXveDC4gZi0FhJioByP4M=; b=scvjqRQddEPoZA274/wrlBf4yn7nJyCqePbow1tofv38pnCv6Hsg4RiT55FRa57uDS XirM+HhKVKI8fKbThbvi6g9rNCmCAR8z85U5z/xMDpnU2qEdvf/V/k7WR0aLwFUPoP22 jQhuCBN0c0TG/5U639Micf1d5IgAz4wcpWvxgOWdpx59GoJ3ZeGVl/1u4yZr64jrGscY B4LRbbrLNCHdBzj9cfAv8Xmj0M8As5EwsWy/s/B4OZwKZcKA2fVQAWBZy8Vq8e0vArRK XHvG+FRdkc/CjCkM3XI2GjZyLXgpEbY6YWTmJ+ujavs49tUrz7ha3xyZS9Jfmb4mrY7j 2Zqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXuuoZNpVgJKbXrofWlAO+9JOKlrFz9Pps4ofqMG9X8g6pHdu7t ay77QGSAAvK4KKGLZheF7bOauhkiYnoCWmYN1Pvg5Xjb
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx2kAVklkl6zT3pB+wFjbmk+njmEBwy4Uzqdz3Pp9qTgvqWxJ9+Neo2btgOYDS/6gtcHN/6selU019oXc90SFo=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:c647:: with SMTP id 7mr4158881ill.28.1576471161279; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 20:39:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AM6PR0702MB36065C7B33DB7E8C1786BEF4F0570@AM6PR0702MB3606.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <015a01d5b2a6$6fefa7f0$4fcef7d0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <015a01d5b2a6$6fefa7f0$4fcef7d0$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Young Lee <younglee.tx@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:39:09 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGHSPWNY4DO9a8ohH+emdecTNyKer4bRmUenzuqjNZ1W5EKW7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Cc: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, opsa@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000911a700599cacb37"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Nh9TOYeVaOb6cK1zoty6vcvOHXE>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] [Teas] Reply to ETSI communication on WIM
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 04:39:25 -0000

+1

Thanks Daniel for a good liaison with ETSI NFV WIM.

Young


2019년 12월 15일 (일) 오전 2:46, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>님이 작성:

> Daniele,
>
> Thanks!
>
> I like that a lot.
>
> Adrian
>
>
>
> *From:* Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Daniele Ceccarelli
> *Sent:* 14 December 2019 17:28
> *To:* teas@ietf.org; CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) <ccamp@ietf.org>
> *Cc:* opsa@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Teas] Reply to ETSI communication on WIM
>
>
>
> TEAS, CCAMP, chairs,
>
>
>
> I tried to put together a  first draft of the reply to the ETSI
> communication.
>
> I would suggest to include the OPSA WG since the reply includes also the
> service and network models defined there.
>
> Here is a preliminary proposal:
>
> -----
>
> The IETF TEAS and CCAMP working groups would like to thank the ETSI ISG
> NFV for notifying the start of the work on multi-site connectivity
> services. We acknowledge the commonalities between the WIM infrastructure
> manager interfaces and the ACTN ones, in particular the CMI (CSC-MDSC)
> interface. Our understanding is that the scope of the WIM interfaces is not
> limited to the management of the underlay Traffic Engineered infrastructure
> but also the connectivity services that can be built on top of that, like
> e.g. L3VPNs and L2VPNs.
>
>
>
> The relevant documents specifying YANG models (and related status) for the
> connectivity services are:
>
>    - L3SM – A service model for L3VPN services – RFC 8299
>    - L2SM – A service model for L2VPN service – RFC 8466
>    - L1CMS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang/
>     stable working group document already reviewed by YANG doctors.
>    - L3NM – https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm/
>     stable working group document
>
>
>
> On the other side ACTN provides guidelines for the implementation of
> interfaces for the management of traffic engineered underlay infrastructure
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-actn-yang/). A wide
> variety of YANG models can be used to implement various features (e.g.
> calendaring, telemetry) but a minimal set of mandatory models to operate
> the network is identified:
>
>
>
>    - TE topology:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo/ –
>    approved by the IESG and in the editor queue
>    - ACTN virtual network:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang/ –
>    stable working group document
>    - TE tunnel: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te/ –
>    stable working group document
>
>
>
> Extensions to these models are defined in the CCAMP working group to
> provide technology specific extensions. TE Topology and TE tunnels
> augmentations are being defined for WSON (Wavelength Switched Optical
> Networks), flexi grid WSON, OTN (digital layer of the Optical Transport
> Network) and microwave.
>
> In the eventuality in which the ETSI NFV ISG identifies additional
> requirements that are not currently addressed in the ACTN framework
> (RFC8453) and models, they can be proposed as individual contributions
> either in the TEAS working group (if technology agnostic) or in the CCAMP
> working group (if technology specific) and follow the IETF process.
>
> ----
>
> BR
>
> Daniele
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>