Re: [CCAMP] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)

"Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com> Wed, 10 April 2019 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEFA120328; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DIjpIQkIyRKe; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C3C912031A; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8FE432BCE4D166771117; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:03:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEMM402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.210) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:03:04 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM528-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.72]) by DGGEMM402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.210]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 04:02:31 +0800
From: "Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org>, "Daniele Ceccarelli" <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHU7wh23pfh9oNfv0KLlfED4BDJraY10gXL
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:02:31 +0000
Message-ID: <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461FCFBDBDBE@DGGEMM528-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <155483726628.19683.16168772559257646283.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155483726628.19683.16168772559257646283.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.220.132.100]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Vc8nZo07AGScyxpAsHmdGcTyQMo>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:03:09 -0000

Hi Roman, 

Thanks for the comments. 
The nits will be fixed. 
Regarding the format of the availability field, yes, it is IEEE754-2008. Reference to IEEE754-2008 will be added. 

BR,
Amy
________________________________________
发件人: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker [noreply@ietf.org]
发送时间: 2019年4月10日 3:14
收件人: The IESG
抄送: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org; Daniele Ceccarelli; ccamp-chairs@ietf.org; daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com; ccamp@ietf.org
主题: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Section 3.2.  Nit.
s/When a node receives Availability TLVs which mixed of zero index and non-zero
index/ When a node receives Availability TLVs with both zero and non-zero
indexes/

s/there’re are/there are/

(2) Section 4.0.  Nit.
s/Especially section 7.1.2 of [RFC5920] discuss/Section 7.1.2 of [RFC5902]
discusses/

(3) Concur with secdir review/Magnus on the need to clarify the format of the
availability field (is it IEEE754-2008?)  If IEEE754 is used (as Ben/Ignas
notes due to RFC8330), then the text should explicitly cite the constraints of
the precision referenced by Magnus.