[CCAMP] Some more discussions on the needs of CCA/CCB configuration in FlexE management

Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Fri, 22 November 2019 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7D9120859 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 06:30:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oY5UmegDSUVd for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 06:30:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFAB212007C for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 06:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 60FE14F4DA002B44E6C7 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:30:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.50) by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:30:16 +0000
Received: from DGGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.202]) by dggeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.50]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 22:30:07 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: "wang.qilei@zte.com.cn" <wang.qilei@zte.com.cn>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Some more discussions on the needs of CCA/CCB configuration in FlexE management
Thread-Index: AdWhQVj1FJZH3gujQwqo78q+6W6IoA==
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:30:06 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BD378FEE7@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.52.42.169]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BD378FEE7dggeml512mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Vno5FvW01HVw-ws0YSX06J4PK90>
Subject: [CCAMP] Some more discussions on the needs of CCA/CCB configuration in FlexE management
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:30:21 -0000

Hi Qilei,

Due to the limited time in the presentation of your slides, we barely had enough time to discuss it in details.
Here I would like to reemphasize that the conclusion you reached in Page 7 (quoted below) is not reasonable:
“Whether type calendar configuration A or B is needed?
* It should be supported.
  According to the definition in FlexE IA, in static configuration: “Such a configuration would
  simply transmit the A and B calendar configurations as fixed, always indicate the
  A calendar configuration as the calendar configuration in use”.
* In order to ensure the consistency between two ends, it’s better to configure the type of cale
ndar at both ends.”

The FlexE IA specifies the A and B calendar configurations (i.e., CCA and CCB) to facilitate dynamic switching of calendar configurations.

But for the above static configuration, CCA is always in use and its values are meaningful (i.e., support a fixed active calendar configuration for verification), while CCB is never truly used (though transmitted in the overhead), and its values are undetermined in the FlexE IA. How does the far end process CCB is also unspecified in the FlexE IA. Under such a circumstance, why configure the CCB in the first place? Even if one can configure the CCB, what values should be provided for them?

Furthermore, the above IA texts also mandates that for a device working in static configuration, we cannot switch calendar configuration from CCA to CCB.

Therefore, configuring the type of calendar configuration (i.e., CCA/CCB) for a device working in static configuration is meaningless.

Kind regards,
Yuanlong