IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CDNi] wonder why no meeting of CDNI in IETF 97

Ask Bjørn Hansen <ask@develooper.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ask@develooper.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BFF12945D for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:13:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d0M6GHiUcgoP for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mbox1.develooper.com (mbox1.develooper.com [207.171.7.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4C412941C for <cdni@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mbox1.develooper.com (mbox1.develooper.com [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mbox1.develooper.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D84D8175E5D for <cdni@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:13:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 16548 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2016 14:13:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?31.133.144.40?) (ask@mail.dev@31.133.144.40) by smtp.develooper.com with ESMTPA; 17 Nov 2016 14:13:54 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3255\))
From: Ask Bjørn Hansen <ask@develooper.com>
In-Reply-To: <BFD67F14EFA8154A8D85951D37E7EBCE52241A@SZXEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:13:45 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D8F40DF1-51EC-422C-A074-7D155D8EC03C@develooper.com>
References: <BFD67F14EFA8154A8D85951D37E7EBCE52241A@SZXEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com>
To: "Zhujirong (Christine)" <jirong.zhu@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3255)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/Zfz3jm11rYUFwBZWsk9BrdhQA3s>
Cc: "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] wonder why no meeting of CDNI in IETF 97
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:13:56 -0000

> On Nov 17, 2016, at 22:23 , Zhujirong (Christine) <jirong.zhu@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Our team have a nice idea in CDN to meet with possible challenges that VR bringing to network. In architecture and algorithm improvement.

If I understand the process right then it’d be appropriate to bring it up on the mailing list before the next meeting (and discussion on the mailing list will show if there’s need for a meeting at the next IETF).

What special demands does VR put on CDN systems?


Ask

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email