Re: [CDNi] [E] Re: Is there a working group meeting planned at IETF104?
Chris Lemmons <alficles@gmail.com> Fri, 08 February 2019 18:15 UTC
Return-Path: <alficles@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F6E12D826 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:15:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lmMGQmcRHShr for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:15:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79B98129741 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:15:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id v26so4556318wmh.3 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:15:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aOKZBexa4QQFj8CoHqR7FnVTvh5BnUo++4zc4xFQkoE=; b=Kt7EKEM2gfDUm3e7XNIrLnqyxhVJlaVkAsgo5Xd3mv1gMx3YeNskJtFpstuGu14Zxs QqbWWaLVWlXwKtTIC8gcohXfwzSzUffJPIu65/S5/275Zh1tsaKzMp8rCiH7sHfOUNJq bunupXIssvOs/rNI+QMZFl/RGOdak3JQ3s2D0xo/9m5SxBEOf3GmjxuLNlfL0iM5unao kC7w+gaMf+Qcngx4Z3j7k+HHUHS6zvCuCEK7wbHN5i1Q+H/LOskfZDW2DGJTv8ji+UT3 s99L5ukipHue9Z4RQg0yK9crKSXYoVbdtMNmOQ3JW4lB9/Kv+RSoe1SqpdygHJjFJGEo jDiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aOKZBexa4QQFj8CoHqR7FnVTvh5BnUo++4zc4xFQkoE=; b=adL7g0YVIBGp2PUm8GJjEYlQS5UsbAf6mFHoy+x0FgL8yEFi8L9MqlKY/ouVwesPeU BKSNE8QefLUs3jZmWAr62yqkxUpOpzBZEgBRaR3sTNmTrXuKtspheyoD8r/yAebwl8UQ HW1runWxLEs1Mn5/JCt1VuNxVQYGj3XEzk3QKiCmdya99a5JaWAuqLKXqD+SEYcMD1AQ plNMxtQKEOM/GBq52q+Eb9TYz47Sp7SIKtZbwfSMnJDIyW5yAcFzrgvXEBTYnPPePUhr iJckIgfVKEj9EFMbU2BDWYLBzkil+CAKsSJjwnmSBcrBH2DTXPBsenA+6vELVp6lNhhF qdmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZcyR0SpwgDn5FsXi07PjvEhsSs/lhiIRjsRGqztW0iRikG6T2t 94WO4i12DxG3s/xd21nzMnb71bOMnWDQ4bLbW30=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZcgaq/VGIJZ/DwYYjNCy+ZaxF0JWbyrPBhgr86k9r+HVNuqXLNu3bc1DjknMNdY/BSyn1qALKTUfrSr4W1Tmw=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:822d:: with SMTP id 42mr8071148wrb.63.1549649724721; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:15:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <dc47846f926a428a9eea81dbb7c85d27@tbwexch02apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com> <CABF6JR3jH-QXQaG39r-RFxMNN-V8ttRtSJ+WK00n6WAZEP-QSQ@mail.gmail.com> <4787030ede3642748fca229aab94a244@tbwexch02apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com> <CABF6JR13Vdes3oQymQnMz63We73vW7k+=5tO8sNRPS7TH9g1Ow@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABF6JR13Vdes3oQymQnMz63We73vW7k+=5tO8sNRPS7TH9g1Ow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Lemmons <alficles@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 11:15:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJEGKNt6BnFi8bXTfHPxa7xah=1aJJxj=JysaeTAUs3p7RVxZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org>
Cc: "Mishra, Sanjay" <sanjay.mishra@verizon.com>, "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/Zht47bdSh3JZyljFTwOVvirrbcQ>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] [E] Re: Is there a working group meeting planned at IETF104?
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 18:15:42 -0000
I second Sanjay's observation. I don't have anything exceptionally pressing, but I think it would be good to circle back again in Montreal. I won't be able to attend Prague in person. In addition to the 3 drafts Sanjay mentioned, there is some substantive feedback on the URI Signing draft that's sitting in Last Call at the moment. On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 8:49 PM Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org> wrote: > > Excellent. Lets see if there is interest, and if so I will get in a request before the deadline. > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 8:39 PM <sanjay.mishra@verizon.com> wrote: >> >> I can volunteer, if there is broader interest in the mailing list seeking for the group to meet. Speaking personally, there is no pressing matter for which I see a need for meeting in Prague, though, it would be good to plan to meet in Montreal. From my perspective (and co-authors), there are three working group drafts (see below) where it would be good to get some feedback on the mailing list. >> >> >> >> 1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-interfaces-https-delegation/ >> >> 2. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions/ >> >> 3. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-triggers-extensions/ >> >> >> >> -Sanjay >> >> >> >> >> >> From: CDNi [mailto:cdni-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phil Sorber >> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2019 4:41 PM >> To: sanjay.mishra=40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org >> Cc: cdni@ietf.org >> Subject: [E] Re: [CDNi] Is there a working group meeting planned at IETF104? >> >> >> >> I am not able to make this meeting in person. AFAIK Kevin is also unable to attend. If the group feels having an in person meeting is important then I would like to ask for a volunteer to proxy the meeting. Kevin or I will be available remotely to run things, but someone needs to be there to do blue sheets and handle in any room issues, etc. >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:24 PM <sanjay.mishra=40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> I am wondering if the CDNI chairs plan to schedule a working group meeting at IETF 104. Last day to request the meeting is Friday, Feb 8, 2019. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Sanjay >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CDNi mailing list >> CDNi@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni > > _______________________________________________ > CDNi mailing list > CDNi@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
- [CDNi] Is there a working group meeting planned a… sanjay.mishra
- Re: [CDNi] Is there a working group meeting plann… Phil Sorber
- Re: [CDNi] [E] Re: Is there a working group meeti… sanjay.mishra
- Re: [CDNi] [E] Re: Is there a working group meeti… Phil Sorber
- Re: [CDNi] [E] Re: Is there a working group meeti… Chris Lemmons