[Cellar] FFV1 Version 4

Kieran O Leary <kieran.o.leary@gmail.com> Tue, 05 January 2016 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <kieran.o.leary@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7D01A8702 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:22:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gjanfhNkUzTL for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:22:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 829FB1A86FE for <cellar@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:22:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id n135so141027241qka.2 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 06:22:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nkZwi4ck6k8dEz1HEepVn3L9Xhs9neH6QlwgCfvAFSg=; b=C44pNc1DuS4PraIWsYCk/BFS18xjCXdcaXAoAhSC+PXphxeEpoDBxq2I8gmPTcOVJC FcBBKB0lGjeyqc6wjqTOpY0T5ND1zUYEz822nRGiKjT2csn3LMZUL393zDRc2mrkWs20 O3w7xTR1F66dPN1yi1qQj+S9p9LOMLyi2idlMZXldK+uPEidAkH4Z48Dss5TnE6LquIl ttAh1Yo2s86hljHmoTls8DETY1TOvhuje6OGk3QqxHi5eejJ7ZQ8RZ5XzXdIDt3yzMYV 8iEprQvZyXJWlANPw7cr7EjQzTXupFDCFDXGPkBBCQnFFfRwY6RxSQv8qIoDazSiUKqH vIHg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.73.74 with SMTP id w71mr124616578qka.60.1452003766749; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 06:22:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.55.106.6 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:22:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:22:46 +0000
Message-ID: <CAO7v-1TCNOcqhv=JR5dMWhibD=kLyQwLztk8RG3v-rtegn7s7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kieran O Leary <kieran.o.leary@gmail.com>
To: cellar@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a802ebad2a1052896f85e"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/RFYBaQSuoULr8sIw9RfHwnfZKvQ>
Subject: [Cellar] FFV1 Version 4
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:22:49 -0000

Hello,

I saw on your charter that a milestone for September 2016 is "Submit
specification for FFV1 video codec version 4 to IESG (Standards Track)".
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/cellar/charter/

Is there any information or roadmap available about proposed changes from
version 3 to version 4? I'm asking as the added features of Version 3 were
significant for moving image archives, and I'm curious to know what version
4 may look like.

Best regards,

Kieran O'Leary.