Re: [Cellar] adding VP8 and VP9

The VP9 link is updated to http://www.webmproject.org/vp9. https://github.com/Matroska-Org/matroska-specification/pull/91 should be ready.
Dave

> On Feb 4, 2017, at 9:50 AM, Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com> wrote:
> 
> The VP9 format specification is still in draft form. We could use https://storage.googleapis.com/downloads.webmproject.org/docs/vp9/vp9-bitstream-specification-v0.6-20160331-draft.pdf as used on http://www.webmproject.org/vp9/. This link is not hosted by IETF but is more up to date.
> 
> Is the IETF actively working on VP9?
> Dave
> 
>> On Feb 4, 2017, at 8:14 AM, Steve Lhomme <slhomme@matroska.org> wrote:
>> 
>> They definitely need to go in. The VP9 link should be changed to
>> something more stable and revent. Otherwise LGTM.
>> 
>> 2017-02-01 23:57 GMT+01:00 Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com>:
>>> Hi cellar,
>>> 
>>> Just before the cellar wg became active there was a proposal on
>>> matroska-devel to document use of VP8 and VP9 in Matroska, similar to how
>>> they have been defined in webm. I started a pull request at
>>> https://github.com/Matroska-Org/matroska-specification/pull/91 to add them.
>>> 
>>> The original thread also proposes adding WEBVTT but it seems there’s some
>>> open questions there about how to do so.
>>> 
>>> Dave Rice
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cellar mailing list
>>> Cellar@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Steve Lhomme
>> Matroska association Chairman
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cellar mailing list
> Cellar@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar