Re: [Cfrg] Dynamic Key Changes on Encrypted Sessions. - Draft I-D Attached

[Peter Alexander <[e-mail]>]

Dear Colleagues,

Thank you for taking my work into consideration. I was worried that nothing
would ever come of it, however the warm reception is most welcome.
Furthermore, I am very happy to see progress on this, and would be more
than willing to review, and adopt changes as necessary.


Peter Alexander
Email: [e-mail]


On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Станислав Смышляев <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Dear Kenny, dear colleagues,
>
> Definitely, I'll do this. But, if you don't mind, I'd prefer to wait a few
> days for the Crypto Review Panel reviews to ‎be posted, because the issues
> related to the scope of the Peter's document ("when to re-key and how to
> control the process")‎ could be also mentioned in the reviews - so it would
> be better to take those considerations into account before further
> discussions.
>
> Best regards,
> Stanislav
> ‎
>   Исходное сообщение
> От: Paterson, Kenny
> Отправлено: понедельник, 6 ноября 2017 г., 13:53
> Кому: Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev; Peter Alexander
> Копия: [e-mail]
> Тема: Re: [Cfrg] Dynamic Key Changes on Encrypted Sessions. - Draft I-D
> Attached
>
> Dear Stanislav,
>
> This sounds like a reasonable way of proceeding.
>
> Please would you initiate a discussion here on the list of the relevant
> principles from Peter's document?
>
> Regards,
>
> Kenny
>
> On 04/11/2017 15:29, "Cfrg on behalf of Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev"
> <[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
>
> >Dear colleagues,
> >
> >
> >The overall scope is close, but draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying is about "why
> >and
> > how to re-key", and the proposed draft is about "when to re-key and how
> >to control the process".
> >
> >
> >As a possible way, we could discuss in CFRG, which general principles of
> >Peter's document (overall principles of how to control the re-keying
> >process) would be reasonble to add to draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying.
> >
> >
> >And questions related to the particular protocols (e.g., IPsec, as in the
> >provided Peter Alexander's draft) seem to be more convenient to be
> >discussed within corresponding working groups - such as ipsecme WG.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Stanislav
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >2017-11-04 17:36 GMT+03:00 Peter Alexander
> ><[e-mail]>:
> >
> >Good morning everyone,
> >
> >
> >I am attaching my first go at a proper I-D for submission. This is the
> >same invention that I had mentioned previously, and is quite similar in
> >scope to what Stanislav is working on (draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-08).
> >
> >
> >Right now I am still working through the Doxygen documentation to
> >translate the control messages into a cleaner I-D format.
> >
> >
> >Kindly review this when you are able to do so, and share your comments.
> >
> >
> >Peter Alexander
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Cfrg mailing list
> >[e-mail]
> >https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>