[Cfrg] Comments - eXtended-nonce ChaCha and AEAD_XChaCha20_Poly1305
Dan Ehrlich <dan@ehrlichserver.com> Thu, 12 September 2019 14:02 UTC
Return-Path: <dan@ehrlichserver.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C088E1200A3 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 07:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ehrlichserver.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cKK-Mi6PeoZm for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 07:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com (mail-io1-xd2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3813120041 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 07:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id j4so54810334iog.11 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 07:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ehrlichserver.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IkjJo1sqWnE/YS2bQAz8GsBosCP7C8YrWZx263K+q00=; b=nWbpuFunUA6BMrZSVuYcxDmN8R2ObMb08L+22uZuEm/LMpRqgdXwq1PbX50mFWB2vh WmpBq1zq0TD94+v6Xa1upf0Y0S5w/mehe+nBTNos7YvySMKNaQ6mCQJrnMsTTH1pk2aE luHj3G7cynzEVNDb9HBl1ExVYsHx4di6S1QuI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IkjJo1sqWnE/YS2bQAz8GsBosCP7C8YrWZx263K+q00=; b=st7xpmsXvP0GwolXG+qRQZEh+HDXGw2EglD485TGb6TF/NaAgFJrCRTaa9rGP9NuVc T7tNd+1IWd36jPVWxJFXX3y9eq6rHSZAggMNMsKyHca7MA6zuVUY/KGYTGJzfm8VqFuf jwhaig/YPMJ2jmGtjsx/MYuyX349BvemIVRlBu/1+C/n787Mvrd3hMVizHR1xxcQcFHg IRg+tOdnubT0fG6pGubCRvDq+FcE7ptBM3AXZBlBpNM81CyjnXLC9nviHQCpsm+IOEeL //aY0Oa7shkFCJSJOPZ8RKKfvJXvZRj5JFr06cReoLTgc2jTNbUPim8XZROuBDCo1vxO vheQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX60hR0IYmWgaiROceeoUq7PqzomWfmF/hjGbn01Wo8/KmNGxUa HPjsQlD2vgotq1OFZ8xNSzAiLeQB4LJZIwnK/ank8G16A3JBBQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxPua3YpkyE2uUDGCmrFjRXJniHg9QI29aaN7BKLejNXKtxmCbTZj44SamN6tzdOBvavL/FFgXPURTDWEvFdwI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:738:: with SMTP id j24mr46162971jad.74.1568296930398; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 07:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dan Ehrlich <dan@ehrlichserver.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:01:59 -0500
Message-ID: <CAABgnxjOMPfT+Tn1g11nd-jWw3LBMGzxV9eE_pJ=2A57uiywNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "cfrg@ietf.org" <cfrg@ietf.org>, "draft-irtf-cfrg-xchacha@ietf.org" <draft-irtf-cfrg-xchacha@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000706a4105925b9585"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/WHAqsF3UxyXczJGyosyhlQ22hKc>
Subject: [Cfrg] Comments - eXtended-nonce ChaCha and AEAD_XChaCha20_Poly1305
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:02:14 -0000
All: I can’t seem to find the original comment thread for this draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-xchacha/ For background I work closely with the SACM wg of IETF. I have nothing to add to this paper other than “strong recommend”. Length should be extended to 192 and process should move forward beyond draft stage. Thank you, Dan Ehrlich San Antonio, Texas CISM, CISSP, CCSP https://linkedin.com/in/danehrlich