IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Coin] CFPs

Joerg Ott <ott@in.tum.de> Fri, 29 November 2019 09:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ott@in.tum.de>
X-Original-To: coin@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coin@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9C5120817; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 01:27:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NGKIlEXApy4h; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 01:27:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mail-out1.in.tum.de [131.159.0.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31CE012009E; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 01:27:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.in.tum.de (Postfix, from userid 107) id BFEE11C0409; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:27:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: (Authenticated sender: ott) by mail.in.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F1361C0408; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:27:08 +0100 (CET) (Extended-Queue-bit tech_lfvpq@fff.in.tum.de)
To: "Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Jérôme François <jerome.francois@inria.fr>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, "nmrg@irtf.org" <nmrg@irtf.org>, "coin@irtf.org" <coin@irtf.org>
References: <826A7D87-707C-476F-A073-7C9C1F8D3330@eggert.org> <CAPjWiCSW2To0ZwPTqYwYiMJ6o+HUBzSpYRGc-5QE0fyHTWhPjQ@mail.gmail.com> <D82F1A7D-890C-4417-A453-0B666BB66BA7@tzi.org> <CAPjWiCR8p-6Z7Qg1EOJforpuv6U6B0jxVM8fWdZtw_Mxvv-KEA@mail.gmail.com> <PR1PR07MB4891DD075F98D7A4CCD25FA4F3460@PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Joerg Ott <ott@in.tum.de>
Message-ID: <6f96653d-afbc-726b-e360-a26b909c2d5e@in.tum.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:27:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <PR1PR07MB4891DD075F98D7A4CCD25FA4F3460@PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/coin/g1FUMi0V3xuLfGnHmal01ryZ2YM>
Subject: Re: [Coin] CFPs
X-BeenThere: coin@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "COIN: Computing in the Network" <coin.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/coin>, <mailto:coin-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/coin/>
List-Post: <mailto:coin@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coin-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/coin>, <mailto:coin-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:27:15 -0000

A sensible way may be considerate posting: if a topic is truly core to
the research group, such as the ACM CoNEXT ENCP workshpo for COIN, this
is fine, IMO.  Same goes for ACM ICN on the ICNRG list.

But it is usually considered a sign of degeneration when list traffic
is dominated by (random) CFPs.  So, I would consider it important that
we lead by positive example. And the RG chairs should tell in private
that they are misbehaving.

Jörg

On 29.11.19 09:37, Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) wrote:
> We also have a policy in NMRG but the issue I've observed is that the 
> sender is often not aware of it and it's difficult to make them aware 
> before posting.
> 
> So, unless there is prior approval of the emails, most of the times the 
> policy cannot be enforced.
> 
> Best regards, Laurent.
> 
> *From:*Coin <coin-bounces@irtf.org> *On Behalf Of *Marie-Jose Montpetit
> *Sent:* Friday, November 29, 2019 08:51
> *To:* Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
> *Cc:* Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>; coin@irtf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Coin] CFPs
> 
> I will sound apologetic but I know that we have people on the list who 
> may not receive all the CFPs we do… But then I know who they are and 
> could manage the announcements otherwise.
> 
> mjm
> 
> Marie-José Montpetit, Ph.D.
> 
> Research Affiliate, MIT Media Laboratory
> 
> mariejose@mjmontpetit.com <mailto:mariejose@mjmontpetit.com>
> 
> mariejo@mit.edu <mailto:mariejo@mit.edu>
> 
> On November 29, 2019 at 8:49:22 AM, Carsten Bormann (cabo@tzi.org 
> <mailto:cabo@tzi.org>) wrote:
> 
>     Note that different RGs may have different policies here, as it is
>     sometimes useful to be a bit more nuanced:
> 
>     https://t2trg.github.io/CFP-POLICY
> 
>     Grüße, Carsten
> 
> 
>     > On Nov 29, 2019, at 08:18, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com <mailto:marie@mjmontpetit.com>> wrote:
>     > 
>     > Sorry. Will stop. 
>     > 
>     > mjm 
>     > 
>     > Marie-José Montpetit, Ph.D. 
>     > Research Affiliate, MIT Media Laboratory 
>     > mariejose@mjmontpetit..com <mailto:mariejose@mjmontpetit.com>
>     > mariejo@mit.edu <mailto:mariejo@mit.edu>
>     > 
>     > On November 29, 2019 at 7:55:10 AM, Lars Eggert (lars@eggert.org <mailto:lars@eggert.org>) wrote:
>     > 
>     >> Hi, 
>     >> 
>     >> I don't find CFP postings terribly useful on IRTF lists. Don't we all get too many of those already?
>     >> 
>     >> Lars 
>     >> -- 
>     >> Coin mailing list 
>     >> Coin@irtf.org <mailto:Coin@irtf.org>
>     >> https://www.irtf..org/mailman/listinfo/coin
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email