[conex] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-conex-mobile-05: (with COMMENT)

["Stephen Farrell" <[e-mail]>]

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-conex-mobile-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-conex-mobile/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------



- There is a huge amount of sales-speak in this document.  Frankly
there is so much of that here, and no counterpoint nor real analysis
that is technically, but fairly, critical of conex, that this seems
like marketing material. Why are the authors, the WG, the area and
the IETF producing that kind of thing? I'm sure there are good
reasons to produce the material, but I'm not at all sure that ought
be done within the IETF.

- Same IPR comment as Ben's. Were the WG aware?