Re: [core] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-05: (with COMMENT)

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

Off-IESG comment:

Do we know how a made-up example would be better?
It’s not like you need to learn the IPSO world to understand this example.
(But if you are reading the document, you may already know about IPSO anyway…)

Grüße, Carsten


> On Aug 29, 2019, at 10:13, Ari Keränen <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Thank you for the review Mirja!
> 
>> On 28 Aug 2019, at 16.30, Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-05: No Objection
> [...]
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Just one minor comment: I guess it okay to use IPSO dimmable light smart object
>> as one real life example, however, one could also just use a made-up generic
>> example instead as I guess it's often done in RFCs.
> 
> We used IPSO object as an example here since the original design and requirements for this work come from the LwM2M protocol that commonly uses IPSO objects. 
> 
> That said, there's no strong need to do it that way and we could change that also to a more generic made-up example if that would be more suitable here.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Ari